Your automation isn't broken. It's just fragile.
When I first started building workflows, I always built for the "Happy Path."
​Trigger happens → Data is extracted → Email is sent. Perfect, right?
​But the reality of business operations is messy:
What if the API is down for 5 minutes?
What if the user inputs a typo in the email field?
What if the webhook times out?
​A beginner builds a workflow assuming everything will go right.
A workflow architect builds assuming everything will eventually break.
​This is why shifting to n8n changed how I build. Instead of straight lines, I now build "Error Catchers" and secondary routing. If Step B fails, the system doesn't just stop—it pings me on Slack with the exact error log and automatically retries 10 minutes later.
​You don’t want an automation that requires you to constantly babysit it. You want an autonomous engine.
​Question for the builders: What is the most frustrating way a "simple" automation has broken on you in the middle of the night?
6
3 comments
Muhammad Fahad Shahriar
3
Your automation isn't broken. It's just fragile.
AI Automation Society
skool.com/ai-automation-society
A community built to master no-code AI automations. Join to learn, discuss, and build the systems that will shape the future of work.
Leaderboard (30-day)
Powered by