With all the talk about real-time AI engines favoring fresh content, I’m wondering how others schedule updates. Are you refreshing routinely, only when performance drops, or just when you have something new to add?

Can we do this for a subdomain hosted under different servers and a routed domain? (Think ClickFunnels or LeadPages)

The Full question that @Heather Philipp asked was: ----------------------- @Julian Lopez I´ve been scanning the calls for mention of a good LLM citing reporting tool. SEMRush seems buggy and expensive. Any chance you guys could release an SOP of the process you highlighted in the AEO training of how you tracked AI chat mentions, etc. We really need an accurate reporting tool - and would be nice to not have to spend time recreating the wheel. :) @Sammar Wamiq ----------------------- My answer: @Heather Philipp Buggy & Expensive seems to be the standard for AI Visibility Tools! We haven't really picked one to recommend because there's just too many ways to address this, and since these tools are based on "guessed" queries that customers may ask and not really a reference of volume, we cannot trust them so much if they claim to have exact volumes or validated queries. What we can do is infer by selecting our business target keyword "Digital marketing agency" but adding the types of modifiers that should lead to your business specifically in natural language, i.e: "Digital Marketing Agency for multi-location hvac home services in Montana" That's what AI is allowing users to find and we should optimize for that type of long-tail solution aware queries We have outlined a Visibility Diagnostic Test (Baseline Setup Checklist) on our "Baseline Setup" call that you can follow to adress initial organic performance and build your ongoing tracking of queries: Part 3: The Visibility Diagnostic Test This section is the reference point to assess current impact and performance. All Optimization should start with this baseline. 1. Branded Search Visibility Baseline (Google) 🔍 - Action: Search for "Your Brand Name".

@Julian Lopez we were in the Skool room, waited for 15 minutes and dropped off. Will you please confirm that we are in fact meeting on Mondays? thank you!

Agency owner spent $8,400/month on writers. I showed him a $99 solution. He kept his prices, fired nobody, just added 9 clients. Here's what went down: THE SITUATION Agency owner: "I need more writers" Me: "Why?" Owner: "We have 6 clients waiting but I'm maxed out" Me: "How many writers now?" Owner: "Four. Costs $8,400/month total" THE BOTTLENECK Each writer: 30 articles monthly Four writers: 120 articles total Current clients: 4 Articles needed: 120 Capacity: Zero Owner: "If I hire two more writers, my margin drops to 15%" Me: "What if you didn't hire anyone?" THE DEMO Opened Contentbase.ai Me: "Pick a waiting client" Owner: "Home services company in Phoenix" Setup live: - Website URL - 6 competitors - GSC connected - Started 2 minutes later: Keyword research done 3 minutes later: Content calendar built 5 minutes later: Article #1 generating Owner: "That's it?" Me: "It'll write all 30 this month" Owner: "Quality?" Showed him samples. Owner: "Better than my junior writers" THE MATH Old capacity: - 4 writers - 120 articles/month - Cost: $8,400 - Serves: 4 clients max New capacity: - 4 writers (keeping them) - System handles 13 clients - Writer cost: $8,400 - System cost: $1,287 (13 × $99) - Serves: 17 clients total Owner: "I can keep my team?" Me: "And add 13 clients" THE DECISION He didn't fire anyone. Repositioned instead: - Writers moved to editing/customization - System produces first drafts - Writers add brand voice polish - Quality went up Signed 9 of the 6 waiting clients. Three more since then. THE RESULTS (60 DAYS) Clients: 4 → 13 Revenue: $42,000 → $136,500/month Team: Same 4 writers (happier roles) Writer cost: $8,400/month (unchanged) System cost: $1,287/month Margin: 24% → 73% Owner's text yesterday: "My writers are actually enjoying work again. No more content factory grind. And we just signed client #14." THE UNEXPECTED WIN Writers didn't leave. They got better roles: - Strategic editing vs grinding articles - Brand voice development