Is there any difference between kenetic vs kenetic pro besides the amount of ketones? Are the tastes of the different flavors the same? When I calculate the per mg dose, the regular kenetic comes out to be a lot less expensive even when I use the discounted price that Anthony Castore offers through his buyers club. At higher doses, the Pro is more convenient, but not at a cost perspective.

This Retatrutide carbs vs no-carbs discussion is a perfect example of the kind of work we’ll be doing inside the Cellular Intelligence Circle. I am attaching a video so you guys can get a sense of what to expect. Not hot takes. Not protocols copied from the internet. Not arguing teams or tribes. Instead, I’ll show you how I actually think. How I zoom out, identify what system is really being affected, and trace decisions back to first principles like cellular energetics, redox balance, signaling hierarchy, and context. You’ll see how to move beyond surface-level debates and start asking better questions. The kind of questions that cut through hype, confusion, and false certainty. The goal of the Circle isn’t to tell you what to think. It’s to teach you how to think for yourself. If you’re tired of conflicting advice, overconfident influencers, and protocols that work in theory but fall apart in real humans, this community is built for you. We’ll break down topics like peptides, metabolism, training, recovery, fat loss, and longevity in a way that connects the dots instead of fragmenting them. We kick off in February, and each month will center around a focused agenda designed to build real understanding, not just information overload. Members will get long-form breakdowns, case studies, monthly live Q&A discussions, and practical frameworks they can actually apply. If this video made you stop and rethink the question instead of picking a side, you’re exactly who this was built for. More details coming soon…. The Cellular Intelligence Circle launches February.

DHA is almost always introduced as a “fat.” An omega-3. Something you supplement for inflammation, brain health, or heart health. That framing is familiar, convenient, and incomplete. Calling DHA a fat is like calling copper “a metal used in pennies.” It isn’t wrong, but it misses the reason biology actually uses it. If you walk away from this article still thinking DHA is nutrition, you missed the point. DHA is not primarily fuel. It isn’t there to be burned for calories. It isn’t present in the brain because the brain “needs fat.” DHA is there because it has electrical properties that other lipids do not. And intelligence, perception, and performance are ultimately constrained by how electrons move. Once you see DHA through that lens, many things that seem disconnected suddenly line up. Why DHA concentrates in the retina. Why it dominates synaptic membranes. Why deficiency shows up as brain fog, visual fatigue, poor recovery, and nervous system instability long before structural disease appears. Why inflammation is often downstream, not causal. This article exists to correct a category error. DHA does not belong in the same conceptual bucket as dietary fats. It belongs in the category of materials biology uses to move information. Most lipids in the body are structurally useful but electrically quiet. Saturated fats are the clearest example. Their electrons are tightly localized. They form stable sigma bonds. They resist deformation. Electrically, they behave like insulation. That isn’t a flaw. Any system that uses electricity requires insulation. Structural lipids give membranes rigidity and durability. They keep compartments intact. But they do not move charge efficiently. Monounsaturated fats add some mechanical flexibility, but electrically they remain limited. One double bond introduces a small region of electron density, but electrons are still largely confined. These fats make membranes more fluid, but they do not fundamentally change how information moves along the membrane surface.