Yes!

👉 Why? - It's bringing them $0 right now, and you can position that it's not really 33,000 since many won't survive a reactivation, and not really "buyers" since the pool of "people who've spent money over a year ago" is just about everybody on this planet and has almost no bearing on if they'll buy anything from you *now*. There's a non-zero chance 50+ people on that list are dead at this point even. 👉 How would you propose the offer? - either $0 upfront and somewhat-above-rock-bottom price based on buyers that survive reactivation, or rock bottom price upfront and convey it's that low because you're not buying 33,000 active buyers but some number far under 33,000 people who've not spent money in over a year and survive reactivation 👉 How would you monetize? - survey them to figure out their current challenges related to the newsletter topic, put 1st offer in front of them that helps them with most common challenge, next offer for next most common, etc. Partner with others who have offers gathering dust that fit the topics or use your own offers if you have them.

Hey Hamoon, have used and helped clients use AC for over 10 years, and the vast majority of sites we build and otherwise deal with are custom coded. Would love to discuss.

@Honey Syed A few reasons: 1. What we're building out will have best practices based on our vast experience, so amount of speakers, structure of pages/copy throughout, structure of the summit itself, things to include in the upgrade, when and how the upgrade is put in front of people, the copy throughout all the email sequences, etc. I just saw someone posting on Facebook if anyone was interested in help to get 1,500 or more leads via a virtual summit - we've dealt with ones getting hundreds of thousands of leads and 6-7 figures of sales, so our experience guiding all parts of this will make a difference. 2. While I've seen evergreen summits, they're not that common and are a great evergreen offer to have, so anything that would build that out as a part of this process for after the "live" launch gives an additional ongoing lead and revenue stream most summits don't have. 3. The evergreen component also negates the usual downside of building a summit in any kind of paid system like GHL, because paying ongoing for a summit that you're no longer getting sales into is a waste of money, while with an evergreen setup, you can continue getting sales of it. 4. People are usually building summits starting from scratch, while this would basically be just tweaking everything already built. So massive shortcutting of the process. 5. For partners who are working with summit hosts for strategy but not the actual building it out, this becomes a pure value-add they can charge a bunch for, and they can even have us do the actual customization of the snapshot for the client's summit so they don't have to lift a finger on anything. There may be more but that's just off the top of my head.

@Honey Syed Our solution turns online summits from potential one-time authority, audience and revenue boosters that are cumbersome to build into valuable wealth-building assets continually generating authority, audience and revenue that are much simpler to build and leverage for anyone looking to gain a foothold in a particular industry or area of expertise.