Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

گارد آزادی

300 members • Free

Liberty Politics Discussion

4.5k members • Free

203 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
Persian Gulf
Genuine question. Why does this slimy POS Hegseth keep mispronouncing the Persian Gulf and calling it Arabian gulf. Does he not have an education or is he just retarded?
1 like • 16d
@Farbod Babaeipirouz Again mountain out of a mole hill... the U.S. imports 4-5% (which we pay for) from them mainly in maintaining relations. "Arabs give U.S oil" mountain 4-5% mole "The oil" narrative doesn't work anymore. You might not like it but these relations but its a huge factor in making the road easier to free Iran. If Iran wants to call the Gulf of Oman, the Gulf of Persia, they can most certainly do so.... and then their (Iran's) mapping would reflect such. Our military has used it specifically since around 2010 and within since the 90's.
2 likes • 14d
@Soap Box Agreed, we port and have bases in the host countries that call it such. If host mapping called it hair pie, we would then call it hair pie. The deliberate mountain producers up in here are hella annoying. Haven't seen anything of good faith out of them in regards to Iran yet but meh whatever.
Remarks at Bundespressekonferenz
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ihMV-9mbAkw
0
0
1 like • 19d
I want a divorce because I refuse to be the wife in this relationship.
1 like • 18d
@Daniel Dom
It Started With Marriage
On April 1st, 2001, the Netherlands became the first nation in human history to legalize same-sex marriage. Years later, in 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court likewise declared marriage a fundamental right protected by the Constitution. President Barack Obama, in a speech at the Rose Garden, declared "love is love" as he celebrated the ruling as "a victory for America." And most Americans seem to agree. A gallop poll suggests that approximately 88% of democrats and nearly 50% of Republicans support gay marriage. So it seems the debate is over. But should it be? In 2007, an Assumptionist priest by the name of Barry Bercier wrote in his book, Skies of Babylon, that if traditional marriage were re-defined to include same sex couples, "the result would be nothing less than the end of the world of man." Sound dramatic? Well -- what is marriage? If marriage were merely a proclamation of love, and if the fundamental purpose of marriage were to reward people who love each other, then gay marriage should be legal. But society does not give certain legal rights, financial benefits and tax breaks to people simply because they fall in love. At least, until two decades ago, that's not how it worked. Barry Bercier defines marriage as "the public and legal recognition of the pre-political duality of the sexes and the significance of the duality for human beings and the social and political order." In other words, marriage -- traditional marriage as it existed across every civilization for nearly all of human history, is the recognition of a unique relationship that pre-exists law and human constructs. That is, the institution of marriage - from Mesopotamia, to Egypt, China, Rome and every Western nation until 2001 -- recognized the duality of the sexes through law because the duality is the nucleus from which life emerges. The relationship between male and female -- man and woman -- whether you are gay, straight, black, white, bisexual, asexual, rich or poor, is our beginning; our source. For every human being, the duality of the sexes is our 'sine qua non' -- without it, life would not exist.
0 likes • 20d
@Janet Johnson Rather certain the ratio's would only strengthen his argument.
1-10 of 203
Red Logan
6
1,394points to level up
@red-logan-9262
Red

Active 39m ago
Joined Jan 19, 2026
Powered by