Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Liberty Politics Discussion
4.5k members • Free
45 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
2 likes • 4d
@Hila Lala I agree with Daniel, labeling any opposer (including Liberals) as “leftists” is a very old far-right discursive tactic, like Daniel says, the Minneapolis protesters were not Maoists or Marxists. But it is easy to get caught in that as most people on this forum and in the video chats typically lean very pro-MAGA, Nationalistic, and Monarchical (typically right-wing).
0 likes • 10d
@Shauna Starcher I get that they’re not just “Christian”—they’re Jewish too. But that still makes them religious, not neutral. So if this is about history, why single out one religious tradition? We inherited a lot of history—we don’t put all of it on classroom walls. Why the Ten Commandments specifically? What makes them uniquely relevant to U.S. history? Unless the claim is (again, a Christian Nationalist one) that the U.S. was founded on Judeo-Christian values. And honestly, you could argue a lot of moral progress in the U.S. has come from moving beyond those values—whether it’s slavery, women’s rights, or treatment of minorities. You can see that kind of thinking clearly in people like R.L. Dabney ( a Presbyterian) in “A Defense of Virginia and Through Her, of the South” (1867) or “Discussions: Evangelical and Theological” (1878), where biblical arguments were used to push back against rights. The idea that America is a “Christian nation” isn’t neutral—it’s been used historically in very different ways, including by groups like the KKK to exclude others (the addition of JUDEO to Christian is a much newer thing and one the KKK would not use). That’s why people, like me, are cautious about it. And saying you can’t reason your way to morality is just a belief, not a fact. Entire ethical systems exist without religion—like utilitarianism or Kantian ethics. So yeah, I still don’t see the principle here—why this text in a public school and not others? PS To quote Huckleberry Finn as he helps Jim escape from slavery and goes against “Christian morality,” “All right, then, I’ll go to hell.” - Mark Twain, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn.
0 likes • 4d
@Jewish Samantha Ooh, yeah, that is true, you are right. The 10 commandments are much more “plain” than the bloody Jesus.
8d •
Islam is the Synagogue of Baal: A Historical, Ritual, Legal, and Eschatological Report
Islam as the Synagogue of Baal: A Historical, Ritual, Legal, and Eschatological Report Molech Baal Hubal Allah Compilation Molech = Baal/Baal Hammon = Hubal/Huba’allah = Allah I. Thesis and Purpose of the Report This report argues that Islam most closely fits the description “synagogue of Baal” because its foundations, sacred geography, ritual practice, legal tradition, martyrdom culture, and eschatological claims preserve the strongest visible continuity with the Baal-linked sacrificial system. The argument is not limited to a simple equation of names, but develops through multiple lines of evidence: Molech and Baal Hammon as sacrificial cults; Hubal as the central idol of the Ka‘ba; Allah as the principal deity of pre-Islamic Mecca; the continued centrality of the Ka‘ba, circumambulation, and the Black Stone; biblical parallels involving Baal worship, sacred stones, and crescent imagery; Qur’anic and hadith material concerning deception, slavery, sexual possession, child marriage, and patriarchal authority; and modern evidence of children being symbolically offered, indoctrinated, glorified, trained, propagandized, or sent toward death through martyrdom and jihad systems. The purpose of the report is to assemble these historical, textual, ritual, legal, social, and modern examples into one cumulative case: that the Baal-linked pattern of sacrifice, domination, sacred violence, and religiously framed death did not end in antiquity, but continued through Islamic forms. Method and Source Note This report organizes evidence into source categories rather than treating any single source type as sufficient by itself. The categories include Scripture and Religious Texts; Ancient / Greco-Roman Sources; Early Islamic / Arabic Sources; Academic Books and Encyclopedias; Ritual and Modern Documented Examples; and Modern Martyrdom / Child-Sacrifice Sources. The method is cumulative: each category is used to support the thesis from a different angle, including chronology, textual comparison, ritual continuity, legal continuity, and modern enacted practice.
0 likes • 6d
Damn, this post was kinda wild. What field of study is this supposed to be exactly? Conspiracy linguistics? This honestly reads less like history and more like a theological conspiracy document with footnotes. “Hubal = Hu-Baal = Huba’allah = Allah” is basically just associative wordplay dressed up as historical analysis. Also, Arab Christians used the word “Allah” before Islam existed and still use it today, so the whole “Allah is secretly Baal/Molech/Hubal” thing kind of falls apart immediately. There are some real historical references mixed in there (Hubal, pre-Islamic idols in the Kaaba, etc.), but the leap from “there were idols in pre-Islamic Arabia” to “Islam is literally a continuation of Baal child sacrifice worship” is… massive. By that logic, you could connect almost any religion to almost anything through symbolic parallels and selective etymology. I am surprised others did not point this out. This is basically ideological pattern-matching dressed up in pseudo-academic formatting.
13d •
According to Hegseth “President would not want to be next to a black female at military events.”
https://democraticwomenscaucus.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=737 https://youtu.be/GjXzsFhnH8A? si=rQ93IwPLr2m6_qdh Does anyone agree with Mr. Hegseth? Maybe Trump’s and Pete’s type are more like white muscular Christian heterosexual males (the ‘muscle Jesus’ types). Do you guys think the president might be okay with an Asian woman or a Hispanic woman? Maybe he is okay with men but not women?
13d •
Unaccountable politicians.
https://youtu.be/cXBChXWydCE?si=RrMLL2sNszAOP24Y The latest in this administration’s inability to let themselves be held accountable for their behavior and, in this case, taxpayer money. Does this administration have the competence, ability, and responsibility to have receive a 1.5 trillion dollar budget?
1-10 of 45
