After talking with hundreds of AI and automation founders, I’ve noticed the same pattern over and over. They’re smart. They have real experience. They know the tools and can build. But they’re not clear on who they help and what problem they solve. If you’re getting started, ask yourself these four questions: 1. What industries have I actually worked in? 2. What problems was I paid to solve in those roles and what were the outcomes? 3. What was slow, manual, risky, or frustrating about that work? 4. Who feels that pain the most if it’s done poorly? If you can answer those, you should be able to complete this sentence: I help [specific people] achieve [specific result] without [time, cost, or risk bottleneck]. Now you have your offer and can align everything to that.

Posting something I don’t see talked about much. Leads don’t usually “go cold.” They just wait. A notification comes in. You see it. You plan to reply. Then the day gets loud. By the next day, replying feels… awkward. By the third, it feels pointless. So the lead gets labeled “not serious.” But deep down, you wonder if timing - not intent - was the real issue. Not because you’re careless. Because running a company eats attention quietly. I’ve seen this happen to good founders with real demand and solid products. It’s a strangely common problem that almost no one admits publicly. Open to know about your opinion?Posting something I don’t see talked about much. Leads don’t usually “go cold.” They just wait. A notification comes in. You see it. You plan to reply. Then the day gets loud. By the next day, replying feels… awkward. By the third, it feels pointless. So the lead gets labeled “not serious.” But deep down, you wonder if timing - not intent - was the real issue. Not because you’re careless. Because running a company eats attention quietly. I’ve seen this happen to good founders with real demand and solid products. It’s a strangely common problem that almost no one admits publicly. Open to know about your opinion?

Building something impressive is easy. Solving the *right* problem is not. Lately, I’ve been paying more attention to where teams rely on manual workarounds, Repeat the same fixes, or accept small errors as “normal.” That’s usually where automation actually creates value. AI feels most powerful when it removes the friction that people have stopped questioning. Curious—when you look at a workflow, what tells you: “This is a real problem worth solving?

Hi everyone, I wanted to share a bit of my story, because it’s shaped how I see everything. A lot of people don’t know this, but I spent around three years in bed after a failed back surgery. After the surgeries, I could barely stand or walk, and I couldn’t sit without serious pain. Life got very small, very fast. It was a strange stretch of time where survival was the only thing keeping the lights on. Now I’ve got a different challenge in front of me. It’s learning how to stop surviving and start thriving. That sounds simple on paper, but when you’ve lived in survival mode for years, thriving can feel unfamiliar. Almost suspicious. Like something you’re not allowed to relax into. I’m here to learn out loud, share what I’m figuring out, and maybe help others who are trying to move from scarcity and survival into something steadier. So I’m curious: 1. What do you need to thrive, in real terms? 2. What do you believe in, even when life gets messy? 3. What do you say no to, to protect your energy and time? 4. What does success mean to you, not to other people? 5. How do you get clear enough to answer the first four honestly? If you’re on a similar path, I’d like to hear what you’re working through. Let’s help each other find a way forward.

I'm curious, as an AI automation consultant who do you work with at your clients? Is it the developers? Is it the product managers? Is it the CEO or MD? Is it the operations, sales, marketing teams?