Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

1 contribution to DeFi University
📈 Advanced Trade Management: Optimization of Profit Retention and Position Scaling
🎯 The Asymmetry of Execution Institutional analysis confirms that the mathematical expectancy of a trading system is determined primarily by decisions made after capital has been committed, rather than the initial entry protocol. 💡 Traders operate under a dual mandate: - Capital Preservation (survival) 🛡️ - Profit Maximization (pursuit of outlier returns) 🚀 The inherent tension between these goals often triggers cognitive biases—such as the Disposition Effect and Regret Aversion—which lead to the premature truncation of winning trades. 😰 The Key Insight: While conservative management satisfies a psychological need for certainty, long-term success in financial markets requires aggressive, mathematically driven models to capture "fat tail" returns. 📊 🎲 Mathematical Optimization of Stop-Loss Strategies The decision to adjust a stop-loss must be a function of statistical expectancy rather than emotional comfort. A rigorous dichotomy exists between strategies prioritizing psychological relief (breakeven stops) and those prioritizing structural integrity (technical stops). ❌ The Breakeven Fallacy Moving a stop-loss to the entry price ("breakeven") is a pervasive retail practice often termed a "free ride." However, quantitative scrutiny suggests this frequently compromises system edge. Arbitrary Variables: The market is influenced by supply/demand and liquidity, not a trader's specific entry price. Breakeven stops introduce non-market variables into the exit equation. 🎯 Expectancy Equation: The expectancy (E) of a system is defined as: - E = (Probability of Winning × Average Win) − (Probability of Losing × Average Loss) I mpact on Average Win: Breakeven protocols truncate potential outliers. Large winning trades often experience retracements that hit breakeven stops before the trend accelerates, replacing a high R-multiple win with a zero result. 😱 Death by a Thousand Cuts: While breakeven stops reduce the frequency of losses, the conversion of potential winners into breakeven trades often results in a lower overall equity curve. 📉
📈 Advanced Trade Management: Optimization of Profit Retention and Position Scaling
1 like • 6d
In some cases going breakeven has played out better than just letting my stops get hit and then the trade going my way. It all depends on your invalidation usually going breakeven at a certain swing point or a liquidity zone is a good choice and only backtesting will showcase whether your breakeven theory/model works or not. In my case after a certain asset has hit a swing point whether structural or internal I usually go breakeven because that is a sign that S/R is near, potential reversal is in play if we get a structure shift or any other confirmation. So it will all depend on your model, yes in most cases just chasing after the trade and adding to momentum add to bigger wins but is the R/R more compelling? It all depends on the trading strategy.
1-1 of 1
Jack Hill
1
4points to level up
@marko-djamtoski-6559
Defi

Active 4h ago
Joined Dec 24, 2025
Powered by