Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More
6 contributions to Copywriting Launchpad
Email Copy review
Hi all, Ive managed to land my first client and I'm in the process of auditing her email list as well as writing three emails to try and reinvigorate her list which has had infrequent sends and poor engagement. Ive had a look at the keywords people search to find her business, created an ideal customer avatar and I've tried to match her tone of voice. Ive also left a quick description of the strategy before each email for the client. Planing on sending to the client for review tomorrow. The client is in mental wellness and the UK market so Ive deliberately gone for value and know like trust over sell sell sell. See doc below for the three emails. Id be keen to hear any thoughts you all might have on these, all feedback welcome. Many thanks in advance. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Dm83PlXy6S9dmWfAqQBOLKN4S9fxXUnh9Nd0XRCENjs/edit?usp=sharing
1 like • 4d
The emails aren't bad but if you are trying to invigorate a dead list I wouldn't sell at all in the first ones you send out. I like the idea of reintroducing yourself and being empathetic but maybe you should really drive in that one core idea of "I realized how much of a negative impact my wellbeing took when I stopped reaching out to people I care about, and I know you probably have felt the same" as a kind of segway into how you will be emailing them more often. Also in your copy I really would not recommend using commas at all, let alone the amount you have used in these emails. Commas make your sentences harder to read for the prospect who is just scrolling on their phone distracted. Use non latinate germanic language that's easy to read and understand
Copy Translation!
Hi guys! i would like to hear your thoughts on my First Copy Translation. Thank you https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pB3j7tNuqN4npFvHhXHXyZnEtH788NCUo1ND_1SeNmM/edit?usp=sharing
0 likes • 4d
I'm not sure what this is, can you provide more context?
Feedback required for 7 ad concepts for LinkedIn and Instagram
Hi all, Posting 7 video ad concepts for my client's AI solution for mid-market ($50M-500M revenue) businesses. It is built specifically for field service industries (construction, electrical, plumbing, and facilities management). Positioning is "owned AI that sees across all your systems" vs. competition software that has got limitations like limited visibility of the business and data not owned by the user. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r0H6HbUnf6xd8V1vumYA0pC2vNMyefjG18oTREbyK3o/edit?tab=t.0 Two formats here: - Ad1/Ad2 — "4 reasons not to use us" satirical structure, split by audience (Ad1 target = general mid-market C-suite, Ad2 = field-service-specific C-suite) - Ad3/Ad4 — founder-story format, explaining why we built this for mid-market instead of enterprise - Ad5 — a single real-conversation story (CFO, 3 days to find revenue by customer) - Ad6/Ad7 — antagonist format going after "big tech AI walled gardens" as the villain, two different tonal approaches to the same idea What I'd love feedback on specifically: 1. Ad1/Ad2 — should I have one ad or four? Each currently stacks 4 separate reasons into one script. Does that hold as one longer ad, or is this actually 8 separate single-idea ads I'm forcing into 2? 2. Ad6 vs Ad7 — which antagonist approach is stronger? Ad6 does a direct "Go-pilot" parody with the AI swearing at the user. Ad7 is a satirical fake-apology with no named competitor. I'm leaning towards Ad7 being the safer, cleverer version. I wanted a second opinion before I decided whether Ad6 is worth reworking or scrapping. 3. General gut check on the founder-story ads (3/4) — does "we built this for the mid-market, not the boardroom" land as authentic, or does it read as a constructed narrative device rather than a real story? Appreciate any eyes on hooks, structure, or anything that reads as off before I take these further.
1 like • 5d
@Abrar Saad I think you need to simplify the ads a lot more in the way you express the ideas because they are written in a confusing abstract way, I understand you are trying to make it sound clever with the "our customers hate how good it is" but you need to be very clear what you mean because even I had to reread over it a few times to get what you mean so someone scrolling on cold traffic is just not going to read it at all
0 likes • 5d
@Abrar Saad people will watch hour long netflix episodes bro dont worry about length that much worry about making it engaging for your target avatar to consume
OptIn Page Feedback
Hello @Nabeel Azeez and everyone! Would love to hear your thoughts on the opt-in page, especially anything you think could be improved. Appreciate your feedback! For context, he’ll be speaking at a webinar in partnership with another organisation. At the end of his talk, he’ll invite attendees to join the waiting list for our upcoming webinar, where we’ll eventually introduce our main offer. Right now, we’re focused on building the waiting list. The sales page is next on my list to write. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bRgaEH2OKf9OzP77mmEGhj7nrMAFFAW6BpOPcfCEQfc/edit?usp=sharing
2 likes • 6d
@Nonalee Eilon Alipda @Nabeel Azeez not knowledgeable enough to give advice but I tried to make it more compelling using my intuition, let me know if it made it better or too much Lol
1 like • 6d
@Nonalee Eilon Alipda makes sense I would really try to drive in that big idea of giving them something that would make them go from just knowledgeable to fully confident and field ready and how this new webinar is that missing piece they need to achieve that, and ofc once they go to the webinar they will hopefully see how the offer you are selling them is the easiest quickest and most straightforward way to achieve that goal
Correct terminology for copy annotation and structure
hey brother, could you calibrate my thinking on hierarchy when studying copy? originally i was thinking: Section > Beat > Sentence Section being something like lead, body, close or CTA. Beat being the persuasive purpose of a smaller group of copy. Sentence being the actual argument or execution. but now im wondering if there should be another level: Section > Framework > Beat > Sentence for example: Lead > Problem > Agitation > Sentence Lead > Problem > Consequence > Sentence Body > Solution > Mechanism > Sentence where im unsure is whether "Problem" and "Solution" should be called frameworks, larger beats or something else entirely. maybe framework should only refer to the overall structure like PAS or AIDA. im trying to keep it simple while using terms other copywriters would understand. what hierarchy would you use?
1 like • 6d
Imo makes more sense to keep it as simple as possible, section beat sentence make enough sense already
1-6 of 6
Julius S
2
13 points to level up
@julius-k-1241
senator, we run ads

Active 1d ago
Joined Sep 21, 2026
Powered by