Hi all, Posting 7 video ad concepts for my client's AI solution for mid-market ($50M-500M revenue) businesses. It is built specifically for field service industries (construction, electrical, plumbing, and facilities management). Positioning is "owned AI that sees across all your systems" vs. competition software that has got limitations like limited visibility of the business and data not owned by the user. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r0H6HbUnf6xd8V1vumYA0pC2vNMyefjG18oTREbyK3o/edit?tab=t.0 Two formats here: - Ad1/Ad2 — "4 reasons not to use us" satirical structure, split by audience (Ad1 target = general mid-market C-suite, Ad2 = field-service-specific C-suite) - Ad3/Ad4 — founder-story format, explaining why we built this for mid-market instead of enterprise - Ad5 — a single real-conversation story (CFO, 3 days to find revenue by customer) - Ad6/Ad7 — antagonist format going after "big tech AI walled gardens" as the villain, two different tonal approaches to the same idea What I'd love feedback on specifically: 1. Ad1/Ad2 — should I have one ad or four? Each currently stacks 4 separate reasons into one script. Does that hold as one longer ad, or is this actually 8 separate single-idea ads I'm forcing into 2? 2. Ad6 vs Ad7 — which antagonist approach is stronger? Ad6 does a direct "Go-pilot" parody with the AI swearing at the user. Ad7 is a satirical fake-apology with no named competitor. I'm leaning towards Ad7 being the safer, cleverer version. I wanted a second opinion before I decided whether Ad6 is worth reworking or scrapping. 3. General gut check on the founder-story ads (3/4) — does "we built this for the mid-market, not the boardroom" land as authentic, or does it read as a constructed narrative device rather than a real story? Appreciate any eyes on hooks, structure, or anything that reads as off before I take these further.