Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The Spanish Enablers

3.3k members • Free

Edúcate Con Kevin

2.2k members • Free

YT Profit School

18.2k members • Free

Elite Setters Community

9.9k members • Free

MarkGrowth

9.7k members • $27/m

Beyond Borders Academy

1.4k members • Free

Men of Action: Forum

3.5k members • $5/m

124 contributions to Men of Action: Forum
The Game
10%—> luck 20%—> skill 15%—> concentrated power of will 5%—> pleasure 50%—> pain 100% reason to learn, play and master the game… 🫵🏽
1 like • Feb 8
100% facts
1 like • Feb 9
@Carlos Garcia yes by being prepared...
🔥Simplifying The Hotness Scale
I’ve always found the typical 1-10 hotness scale a bit problematic. Firstly, it’s very inconsistent when it comes to actually rating a girl’s attractiveness. One guy will rate a girl a 6 whilst another one will rate the same girl as an 8. At the top of the scale, things get a bit more consistent since most men agree on who the real 10s are, but the further down you go, things start to break down remarkably. Like, what’s the difference between a 4 and a 5? Nobody knows. And secondly, I’ve also seen that even though the mathematical average of the 1-10 scale is 5, no one thinks of average girls as 5s. Average-looking girls usually get about a 7 or an 8 grade, and a 5 is usually considered to be of below-average attractiveness even though it is, in fact, the average. So that skews the whole ranking system upwards, making it once again, inaccurate and unhelpful. I remember watching a proposal for a different rating system years ago and I thought it would be a good idea to bring it up here and see what you guys think about it. This rating system is extremely simple, so it dispenses with all the variability and imprecision that is inherent in the 1-10 scale. The system uses a scale of 1 to 3 as follows: 1s: These are girls that are so unattractive you wouldn’t have sex with them even with your best friend’s dick. 2s: These are girls that are attractive enough for you to have sex with them, but you wouldn’t tell a soul about it and would prefer to take the secret to your grave. 3s: These are girls that are so attractive you would not only have sex with them but you would also proudly shout it out so the entire world knows about it. What I like about this system is that not only is it simple and effective, but that rather than seeking to objectively evaluate a woman’s attractiveness score (which is impossible to universally agree on), this system gets to the core of what is truly behind the whole purpose of rating girls in the first place: the pride or shame of dating or having sex with a particular woman.
1 like • Feb 3
@Kyle Mullaney interesting scale
Business Bros stick together
Business owners do things for each other. They give each other deals on services for each other, let each other use their vacation homes, take their mutual friends on their boats and airplanes and all kinds of stuff. Guys who make money gravitate toward other guys who make money because they realize it is a particular kind of mindset. Value and scarcity dictate all human relationships.
2 likes • Feb 3
Networking 101
Post Worthy?
For the group photo, which one is better?
Post Worthy?
0 likes • Feb 3
@Casey Herzog i agree, i have the urge to neck knuckle that guy
Fun Fact
The classic James Bond super villains were based on real billionaires and the stories are based on schemes crazy billionaires actually tried to pull off. My favorite part about knowing this is also knowing that the villian Blofled was based off of Karl Schwabs father… White cat and everything…🐛🐞🍽️
Fun Fact
0 likes • Jan 29
Then mother fuckers are weird asl
1-10 of 124
Juan Rivera
5
252points to level up
@juan-rivera-5997
Aprendiendo español

Active 63d ago
Joined Mar 24, 2025
Powered by