Most people accept ruined photos They shouldn’t AI can now remove photobombers so clean it looks like they were never there No weird artifacts No broken background No obvious edits Just a natural, untouched photo Prompt 👇 "Remove the unwanted person or people photobombing this uploaded photo while keeping the main subject or subjects and the rest of the scene completely unchanged. Identify the photobomber - the person who is clearly not the intended subject, who may be walking through the background, making faces behind the subject, partially visible at the edge of the frame, or otherwise intruding on the photo. Remove them completely from the image. Reconstruct the area behind where they were standing with the appropriate background - seamlessly fill in with whatever environment, texture, pattern, or scenery would naturally exist in that space based on the surrounding context. The reconstruction must be seamless - matching the existing lighting direction, color temperature, texture patterns, and perspective perfectly so there is no visible trace of the removal. If the photobomber was partially overlapping the main subject, carefully restore the main subject's body, clothing, or hair that was hidden behind the removed person. Do not alter the main subject or subjects in any way. Do not change any other element of the scene. The final result should look like the photobomber was simply never there — a clean natural photo with no trace of editing." 💡 Works best on: • Travel photos • Couple shots • Group pictures • Any “almost perfect” image Try it and drop your result below 👇

solo-founded startups went from 23% of new businesses in 2019 to 36% in the first half of 2025 and the reason isn't that entrepreneurship got more popular or that VC money got easier to find one person with the right AI setup can now cover what used to take a team of eight to run there's a man who built a $1.8 billion company without hiring his way to that number, and most people saw that story and filed it under "exception" without asking what actually made it possible Lets dig deeper what curve is happening… The same work didn't get evaporated, but rather the ways of completing that work did: > customer follow-up > content > reporting > internal operation the stuff that used to require people in seats now runs in the background while one person focuses on the decisions that actually move the business forward take OpenClaw for example, a single operator can now run automated research, outreach, and pipeline management across hundreds of leads simultaneously, the kind of operation that used to need a sales team with a manager sitting on top of it the base just got a lot cheaper to build on, which is why we can see such surges in companies

Hey everyone, my name is Pascal, I’m 21 and originally from Luxembourg, currently living in Vienna. I’m pretty new to AI automation and looking for someone who’s in a similar stage and wants to grow together — sharing progress, staying accountable, and figuring things out along the way. I speak German and English, and it would be great to connect with someone from Europe and around my age. If that sounds like you, feel free to reach out — we can jump on a quick call and see if we vibe :)

I just made a post on LinkedIn about this, but I wanted to give you guys a slightly different version: I uploaded 29 YouTube videos in the past 28 days. 4.1M views. 280K watch hours. 68K new subscribers. And I even took a full week off in the middle of it. You guys in the comments and in here are asking me things like "Do you ever sleep?" and "Are you using an AI avatar?" Yes I sleep and no I don't use an AI avatar. I even edit all of my tutorials myself. Honest answer: I have an incredible team that helps keep everything running, and AI agents and systems that let me get done in a single day what used to take me a full week. This amount of YT output would be impossible without the AIS+ team here! @Jon Morrow, @Yash Chauhan,@Ednan Abdullayev , @Usman Mohammed, @Dominic Ibarra, @Mustafa Tawfiq, @Jenn Arman, @Meghan Cox, @Kodi Zene, @Ines Rodriguez. @Aidan Stanik, @Eitel Grace Rodriguez, @Anne-Marie Enns, @Pat Blakely, and we're growing even more in Q2! But that's still not the full answer. The full answer is passion. And I want to talk about burnout for a second because I think people gloss over this too fast. Burnout is real. I've felt it before. And spamming more content doesn't automatically mean better results. More output without intention just accelerates the crash. That dip in the graph is a full week in Florida with my girlfriend and my family. Phones down. No filming.

Curious what people here think In the next 5 years, what AI products do you think will actually exist and become normal? Not just better chatbots I mean real products people use in everyday life or business Could be things like: • AI wearables • home robots • AI phones or glasses • ultra-realistic video tools • personal AI assistants that actually do things • business agents running tasks on their own • AI healthcare devices • physical products we haven’t even thought of properly yet What do you think is most likely to happen first? And what sounds exciting now but probably won’t happen the way people expect?