This beautiful new being just arrived on planet earth and she has stolen my heart ❤️ I have only had sons so far this lifetime so she is a great blessing. I have therefore not been in the community so much but wanted to give you a quick update on things: 🎬 A new podcast episode will drop soon so keep your eyes peeled 👀 🐾 I am thinking a lot how to structure the coming premium group (this will be for those of you who want to work more closely with me.) An update on this coming soon. 🐣 I am planning a new YouTube channel. It will be more simple, less edited. ETM Channel kind of pushed me in a certain direction but I also want to talk in a simple way on how to bring the liberated perspective in our day to day. What might Enlightenment look like without the gurus, having to meditate in a cave or overdose on Ayahuasca? Keep you posted! 😺 If you would like me to organize a new Q & A soon let me know in the comments below. I would love to hear from you ❤️ Much Love, Justin

This first live community call turned into something much deeper than expected. What started as a simple introduction quickly evolved into a raw, honest, and wide-ranging conversation about spirituality, community, truth, and the challenges of living consciously in the real world. People joined from all over the world — from Dublin to Boston, Germany to Sweden, Vancouver to Italy. 🧐 Key Questions From the Community Ella — “How can a global community actually work when we’re all spread out?” A deep dive into: - Online vs physical connection Tom — “What is your vision for this community?” This opens one of the most important parts of the conversation: - Mapping a path to freedom - Creating a blueprint for conscious communities - Exploring what comes after the current cultural systems break down - Introducing the idea of “enlightened communication” Monica (Germany) — “This space removed my sense of isolation.” A powerful reminder of: - How rare genuine spiritual connection is - Why most people feel alone on this path - The real role of community Lara — “Why do spiritual people avoid talking about real-world issues?” This sparks a major theme: - Spiritual bypassing vs grounded awareness - The discomfort around discussing geopolitics, suffering, and reality - Why “staying positive” can sometimes become avoidance Zia (Maryland) — “How do we avoid cult dynamics in spiritual communities?” A crucial and honest challenge: - Guru dynamics and power structures - Whether frameworks like 12-step models could help - The balance between leadership and autonomy Lucia — “What suffering made you seek enlightenment so early?” - The drive to escape suffering vs understand it Another Key Question — “Can we really create our own reality?” A nuanced response covering: - Law of attraction vs real-world cycles - Intentionality vs illusion - The role of focus, timing, and listening ❤️‍🔥 Themes That Keep Coming Up Across all questions, a few core themes emerge:

Welcome! Our new community is only just unboxed and unpacked so you can still smell the fresh paint. Likely things will be a bit quiet as new people join over the next few weeks. ☕ Start by introducing yourself in the comments below 👇 It will be cool to know a bit about you and your motivations for joining. 🔥 I will be putting up a series of podcasts we made over the last few months. Find them in the Classroom These should serve as context and grounds for questions and discussions. 🔓 The platform grants you access to the Classroom after your first post or interaction. You can find yourself on the leaderboard here. 👩‍🚀 This main area of the community will always be free for members. Later I will add paid tiers for those that want to go a bit deeper with me via live group calls and discussions. These levels will be optional. Remember without your input and ideas this is just an empty space. So don't wait for any one else to go first - it's up to YOU! Love ya! Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMUNITY GUIDLINES: - Please make sure you have uploaded a Bio and foto to your profile within 7days

Great to hear back from so many of you! Looks like most people can make this Sunday. This is an ask me anything. We will go into any of the subjects that I speak about in my videos or in the podcasts here in the Classroom area. Call is free and everyone in the group is invited 🔥 The call will be via the Skool platform. Check out the details here and save to your calendar - see your local time. Speak soon! Justin ❤️

I’d like to talk about denial for a minute or two. Not the dramatic kind. The reasonable kind. Denial today sounds calm. It borrows therapy language. It uses moral vocabulary. “I’m protecting my peace.” “I’m setting boundaries.” “That’s just how I am.” “I don’t have the emotional capacity.” “I’m just being honest.” Sometimes those statements are healthy. Sometimes they are necessary. But sometimes they are exit ramps. A boundary limits access. Denial limits examination. If a phrase reliably ends conversations, shields you from being wrong, and leaves your behavior unchanged, it is not wisdom. It is denial with better branding. The same confusion shows up around the word must. “I had to be harsh.” “I had to cut them off.” “I had to escalate.” A must means there was no viable alternative that reduced harm over time. No cleaner option. No lesser cost. If another option existed and you chose the one that increased fear, resentment, or shutdown, you were not forced. You chose. Walking away to prevent harm can be a boundary. Refusing to acknowledge harm already caused is denial. Removal can be necessary. Humiliation is not. No contact can be clean. The silent treatment is punishment. Cruelty tied to necessity feels like surgery, not self-expression. If it feels righteous or satisfying, it probably was not required. You are allowed to feel angry. Ethics is not about what you feel. It is about what you choose anyway. If your behavior made the situation worse, you did not have to do it. This applies most clearly in relationships. If you are in a relationship by choice, it is almost never 100 percent the other person’s fault. You chose to stay. You chose to engage. You chose what to tolerate. That does not mean you caused everything. It means you participated. Total innocence in a shared dynamic is usually a sign that something is not being examined. The distortion becomes harder to see online. At human scale, escalation has visible fallout. Online, you see numbers, not faces. Outrage scales. The crowd forms. Responsibility diffuses.