Question: Plastic shopping bags are used widely and cause many environmental problems. Some people say they should be banned. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Response: Plastic shopping bags have become an essential part of modern life due to their convenience and low cost. However, their widespread use has led to serious environmental problems. I strongly agree that plastic shopping bags should be banned because of their long-term damage to ecosystems and the availability of more sustainable alternatives. One major reason for banning plastic bags is their harmful impact on the environment. Plastic is non-biodegradable and can take hundreds of years to decompose. As a result, discarded bags often accumulate in landfills, rivers, and oceans. Marine animals frequently mistake plastic bags for food, which can lead to injury or death. Furthermore, the production of plastic bags requires fossil fuels, contributing to carbon emissions and climate change. Given these severe environmental consequences, continuing to allow their unrestricted use seems irresponsible. Another important consideration is that practical alternatives are readily available. Particularly, reusable cloth or paper bags are more environmentally friendly and can be used multiple times, reducing overall waste. Although some argue that banning plastic bags may inconvenience consumers or increase costs for businesses, such challenges are minor compared to the environmental benefits. In fact, several countries that have introduced bans or taxes on plastic bags have successfully reduced plastic waste without significant economic disruption. In conclusion, due to the serious environmental damage caused by plastic shopping bags and the existence of sustainable substitutes, I strongly believe they should be banned. Taking decisive action against single-use plastics is an important step toward protecting the environment for future generations. =============================================================================

Headings（找小標題） ★ 如果是在第一大題就碰到這種題目，我就會「先放棄」，先做後面的題型，因為Heading題考你對一整段落的了解，太花時間 ★ 可以瞄一下羅馬字的選項，看看有哪些選擇 ★ 如果有一個選項中出現一個英文字，某個段落也有，要注意！這是陷阱！IELTS不會那麼笨，標題不會用到段落裏出現過的字 True/False/Not Given（是非題） ★ 先看題目，劃出關鍵字，然後去文章裏找跟關鍵字有關的地方 ★ 找到跟關鍵字有關的那一段以後，很快的把這一段念一遍 ★ 考題的順序跟文章的排列順序應該是一樣的，不會跳來跳去 ★ 說得很滿的問題，譬如句中有can, must, only, always, all等這種字的通常答案都是False ★ 文章有比較，但是答案給的是沒比較的句子，譬如文章說，“鯨魚比較喜歡住在太平洋”（這是我隨便掰的，不知道是不是真的）而答案說“鯨魚都住在太平洋”，答案是“False”．但如果問題說“鯨魚不會住在大西洋”，答案就變成是“Does Not Say”或“Not Given” ★ 比較賤的就是這種Not Given的，有的時候答案聽起來很合邏輯，或是根本用頭腦想也覺得是對的或錯的，但是文章中沒有提到，你就是不能寫T或F，要寫“NG”！ Multiple Choice（選擇題） ★ 先讀題目，劃出關鍵字，然後去文章裏找跟它有關的地方 ★ 很快的讀這一段 ★ 考題的順序跟文章的排列順序應該是一樣的，不會跳來跳去 ★ 說得很滿的句子通常都不會是對的選項 ★ 相對的, 比較模糊的句子, 譬如might, may, could, can, sometimes, not always等等, 就比較像對的選項 Diagram/Flowchart/Table Completion（填表填圖題） ★ 流程圖是通常是考東西的結構、時間或功能等 ★ 答案常會是專有名詞或沒看過的單字 ★ 答案通常都出現在某一段或兩段裏，相當集中，所以眼睛不用跑太遠 ★ 這是最簡單的題型，不能錯在這裏 Summary（摘要填空） ★ 先讀題目，劃出關鍵字，然後去文章裏找跟它有關的地方 ★ 要你填的空格前後的字通常比較有可能是關鍵字 ★ 答案通常都是比較難的字，或不認識的字 Short Answer Questions（簡答題） ★ 先讀題目，劃出關鍵字，譬如人名、地名、年份、數字等 ★ 考題的順序跟文章的排列順序應該是一樣的，不會跳來跳去 ★ 如果答案是文字，通常就是原文原詞 Matching（從屬關係搭配題）Part 1 ★ 沒有順序性，文章跟題目跳來跳去 ★ 仔細看清楚題目，從頭到尾把題目看完，搞清楚他要你找什麼 ★ 然後從頭到尾快速看完文章，開始配對 ★ 通常第一題答案通常在文章後面；最後一題又在文章前面 Matching（因果關係搭配題）part 2 ★ 題目是結果（effects），選項是原因（causes） ★ 考題的順序跟文章的排列順序應該是一樣的，不會跳來跳去 ★ 不用先全部看完題目，一道一道做就可以 ★ 有一些表示因果關係的字要注意, 譬如because (of), since, as, for, therefore, so, result in/from, base on, due to等 Matching （作者及其觀點搭配題）Part 3 ★ 先看文章，看有哪些人名，還有這個名人說了什麼，把它圈起來 ★ 然後看題目，找出關鍵字 ★ 通常第一題對應文章後面的觀點；最後一題則對應前幾個觀點 Sentence Completion（完成句子） ★ 先讀題目，劃出關鍵字，然後去文章裏找跟它有關的地方 ★ 然後從頭到尾快速的念那一段 ★ 考題的順序跟文章的排列順序應該是一樣的，不會跳來跳去

Hi ! I’m currently a university student who is preparing for IELTS, and I also love listening to music and engaging any kind of sports. Not only do I want to get a band 7 in test but also making friends here.