I opened an article this morning about the death of Oscar-nominated actress Barbara Barrie, who died at age 95 after choosing Medical Aid in Dying (MAID), and I was absolutely appalled by the headline: "Oscar-Nominated Actor Dies in Assisted Suicide at 95." I have spent more than 50 years working with people who are dying, supporting families, and educating others about end-of-life choices. And I am deeply troubled by the continued use of the term "assisted suicide" to describe a legal, medically supervised end-of-life option chosen by a terminally ill person. Barbara Barrie had terminal cancer. She had lived a long and remarkable life. She was an advocate for New York's Medical Aid in Dying law, and when her own death approached, she made an informed decision to use that option. Her family has described her final moments surrounded by love. She deserved to have her story told with accuracy, context, and dignity. There is an important distinction between suicide and Medical Aid in Dying, even though people hold differing ethical, religious, and philosophical views about that distinction. In jurisdictions where Medical Aid in Dying is legal, it is an end-of-life option available only to people who meet specific medical and legal requirements. It is not a casual decision, nor is it available simply because someone is tired of living. You do not have to agree with Medical Aid in Dying to understand why language matters. You do not have to choose it for yourself to respect that another person may make a different choice. And you certainly do not have to abandon your personal beliefs to have a compassionate, informed conversation about death. As an end-of-life educator, I believe our responsibility is to educate, not sensationalize; to understand, not immediately condemn; and to recognize that dying people are human beings, not headlines. We need more conversations about mortality, suffering, quality of life, advance care planning, hospice, palliative care, and the choices available to people approaching death.