Is it finally time to arm the Iranian people to fight back against the Islamic Republic? The United States and Israel are paving the way by taking out regime bases, but the regime is already importing proxy forces from Iraq, Pakistan, and Afghanistan to maintain their grip. Some argue giving civilians weapons will only lead to a bloodbath and neutralize the advantage of Israeli drone support. Others say unarmed protests are no longer enough against a regime willing to slaughter millions. If strikes on leadership and bases fail, a targeted strategy of arming vetted Iranians in a liberated southern city might be the only option left. Watch the full breakdown and tell me where you stand in the comments.

After the war is over, one of the main changes in the middle east is the new alliances… one that is already kinda existing are: Israel - UAE, Israel - Azerbaijan Israel - Sumali-land in the future: Armenia - Azerbaijan - Iran - Georgia - Ukraine - Israel UAE - Saudi Arabia - Israel - Kuwait - Sumali-land although Ukraine isn’t in the middle east but i believe it will take some significant role at some point (they have one of the largest operational ground forces that are experienced in a modern drone warfare)

According to Islamists when the Islamic Republic falls it will be the defeat of the "Party of Allah" known in Islamic political theology as "Hezbollah" (Arabic: حزب‌الله) while the "Party of Satan" known as "Hezbol-sheytān" (Arabic: حزب‌الشیطان) will be victorious which is the enemies of Islam the very same forces that will bring about everlasting secularism in all of Asia under the leadership of the Iranian Zoroastrian Nation of the new Free Iran which will justifyably have historically the most hostility towards Islam and it's allies in Asia whom all have similar concerns about the problematic nature of Islam that is incompatible with modernity unless it's extremely secularized Here is the list of countries that Islamists consider as members of Hezbol-sheytān: 1 - Zoroastrian IRAN — The Anti-Islam Capital 2 - Jewish ISRAEL 3 - Hindu INDIA 4 - Shinto JAPAN 5 - Confucian KOREA 6 - Buddhist SRI LANKA 7 - Buddhist MYANMAR 8 - Buddhist BHUTAN 9 - Buddhist THAILAND 10 - the USA • The United States under normal circumstances would be considered according by Islamist Forces to be a member of the "Party of Satan" and the most significant one at that however since the USA will be embracing the Monroe doctrine it will be the new policy to put Iran, Israel and India in authority to manage the problem of Islamic problems of Asia on it's behalf in the future thus the USA will not be a member of the so-called "Party of Satan" since it won't be playing any roles in fighting Islam in Asia in the future Iran will automatically become the Anti-Islam Capital of the world because of the simple fact it has the #1 Islam-hating nation in the world proportionally speaking in terms of population percentage rate despite having a lesser overall population number than India. It is very fitting from the stand point of history that Iran would be the country to become the Anti-Islam Capital of the world by having the #1 Islam-hating nation on the planet since Zoroastrian IRAN was the first country to be conquered by the original savage Arab Muslims of the wasteland known as Arabia in the 7th Century AD which is why it makes alot of sense that Iran would lead the Anti-Islam Coalition in the future considering it has had the most experience with resisting, dealing and combatting against the horrors of Islam

I saved this for a separate post because I happen to share a lot of libertarian values, but my god I cannot stand libertarians. At least, not American libertarians. I believe in maximal personal liberty. I believe in minimal economic interference by government. I believe in minimal taxes, and I'm open to the idea that all taxation is theft. I am a gun rights absolutist and a free speech absolutist. I am not an open borders advocate, but I'll save that for another time. The short version is that even Galt's Gulch needed to have border controls to avoid being taken over by people who did not share the values on which they were building their community. But where I differ from libertarians, apart from my belief in national sovereignty and border control, is that I am a firm interventionist. And here is why. Let's start with the fact that in order for property rights and contracts to be enforced, we have to have some enforcement mechanism. Some people might suggest we have essentially anarchy and every person should be left to enforce their own contracts. To such people, I say, we cannot have a discussion unless you acknowledge what reality is like. Such a system is never going to work for the same reason communism cannot work: it only works if every single person voluntarily commits to following it. In reality, humans will always try to twist things to their own advantage. So on some level we need police, or some similar enforcement mechanism. Now, the next question is, who should get the protection of that enforcement mechanism? And while I do believe in borders, my ultimate answer is that everyone should get that enforcement mechanism to protect their personal liberty and economic liberty. Everyone that we can practically provide it for. After all, why should I care, if I am a libertarian, if my neighbor's property rights are violated by a robber? They aren't me. That isn't 'my problem.' Why should my resources go to police who are going to catch that robber and return the property? When Rand Paul was assaulted in his home, why should my tax dollars go to provide police who catch the assaulter? Yet almost all libertarians think that we should, for some reason, care. That my tax dollars should in fact go to paying to protect Rand Paul (and let me say of all the people in the US, he's lowest on the list of people I care about protecting, after how he has talked about Iran).

Throughout the past decade, I have repeatedly witnessed and confronted the disturbing alliances between radical leftist organizations and Islamist extremist groups. These partnerships, often masked as social justice activism, consistently reveal a shared hostility toward Western values, Israel, and democratic principles. Some of the more significant examples n the following responses include the following: In 2015, I faced off against radical leftists, including Daisy Khan and other individuals aligned with the mullah regime, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Hamas, outside AIPAC in Washington, D.C. In October 2023, following the Hamas October 7 terrorist attack on Israel, I confronted radical leftist organizations, including Antifa, the Marxist Youth League, the Workers World Party, Students for Justice in Palestine, and other aligned groups. In November 2025, I documented radical leftist groups — including Antifa, the Marxist Youth League, the Workers World Party, Students for Justice in Palestine, and other co-aligned actors — as they supported the violent Marxist Maduro regime in Venezuela, the mullah regime occupying Iran, the Castro regime occupying Cuba, and Hamas Last Saturday at the “No Kings” rally in Buffalo those same groups Antifa, the Marxist Youth League, the Workers World Party, Students for Justice in Palestine, and other co-aligned actors — as they supported the violent Marxist Maduro regime in Venezuela, the mullah regime occupying Iran, the Castro regime occupying Cuba, and Hamas These repeated encounters demonstrate a clear and consistent pattern: radical leftist organizations are not merely protesting — they are actively aligning with authoritarian regimes and terrorist groups that oppose freedom, democracy, and human rights. This dangerous convergence should concern anyone who values liberty and Western civilization. It is essential that we recognize and confront these alliances before they further erode the principles that underpin our society.