It was time to dust the collection. Funny how it always takes longer then it should, due to me stopping to smell the bottles Anyways this is what the collection is looking like today. 🙂

Does anyone have any experience making there own Cologne ? Its been in my head for years I think its time give it a try !!

Before posting about a fragrance, especially a clone, take a minute to do a quick search. The information is incredibly easy to find online. Most clone houses openly state what a fragrance is inspired by, and if they don’t, a simple search will usually tell you within seconds. There really isn’t much excuse for not knowing or not mentioning the original when discussing a clone. One thing I’ve never understood is why some people will discuss a clone and never mention the original fragrance it was inspired by. I don’t have a problem with clones existing. I’ve owned plenty myself and they can be a great way to experience a scent profile without spending a fortune. My issue is when anyone posting in a forum, Facebook group, Reddit thread, or fragrance community talks about a clone as if it exists in a vacuum and never acknowledges where the idea came from. To me, that crosses into artistic theft. Not necessarily in a legal sense, but in a creative sense. The original house paid for the perfumer, research, development, testing, raw materials, and creative vision that produced the scent in the first place. The clone house is building on a foundation someone else created. Whether the clone is 70%, 80%, or 95% similar doesn’t change the fact that the inspiration came from somewhere. When someone says, “This fragrance is amazing,” but never mentions that it’s inspired by another fragrance, new hobbyists may never learn about the original. Over time, the original creator and perfumer receive less and less credit for the artistic work that made the scent possible. I’m not saying people shouldn’t buy clones. Buy whatever fits your budget. I’m simply saying that if you’re going to post about a clone, give credit where credit is due. Mention the original fragrance. Acknowledge the source. To me, that’s not about being a niche snob, a designer loyalist, or anti-clone. It’s about respecting the artistry, history, and creators behind the fragrance that inspired it in the first place.

Good morning, everyone! I decided to kick off my week by wearing 1419 Madeira from Leme, a special bottle gifted to me by my wife during her trip to Portugal. Right from the opening, 1419 Madeira greets you with a bright and refreshing burst of apple. There's a mild sweetness that prevents the fragrance from feeling overwhelming, making it an excellent choice for those hot days. However, as you wear it for about half an hour, the fruity apple notes begin to recede, giving way to a heavy floral aroma. This is where the scent really shines, but it’s important to note that the middle notes are quite floral, so you should be comfortable with that profile if you decide to try it. The dry down occurs around the two-hour mark, transitioning from the bold florals to a clean and light skin scent characterized by creamy woods and musk. This pleasant base lingers close to the skin, lasting around 3-4 hours depending on the weather. I found it to be a bit more enduring on warmer days, sometimes reaching just over the fourth hour of wear. Overall, 1419 Madeira is truly a springtime-in-a-bottle scent. It's light, fresh, and floral—ideal for daytime wear on warm occasions. The fragrance is marketed as unisex, but with its floral heart and musky finish, it definitely appeals to those who appreciate floral notes. Personally, I enjoy florals, so I felt right at home with this one. If you aren't a fan of floral fragrances, you might want to sample it first, as that element is quite pronounced. In summary, if you’re in search of a refreshing and floral scent that embodies the essence of spring, 1419 Madeira is worth a sample.

A bitter-citrusy, salty, green and musky juice that is very refreshing and uplifting for the heat. Nice performance and longevity.