Why the federal government should enforce anti-discrimination rules for the bar. Access to justice is a public good - Lawyers affect liberty, property, and rights. - If entry is gated by cost, geography, or private tests (LSAT/law school), the public suffers from fewer competent lawyers and inequitable legal representation Merit + trust is sufficient for competence - High school diploma (basic literacy), passing a background/ethics check, and passing a standardized bar exam is enough to ensure minimum legal competence. - Extra barriers mainly protect private interests (law schools, LSAC) rather than the public. Current system discriminates against the poor and rural - Expensive tuition, tech requirements, and elite-school pipelines disproportionately exclude low-income applicants. - The result: the legal profession favors the wealthy, perpetuating inequality. What a merit-based model would look like Requirements: - High school diploma or GED - Background/character check - Standardized bar exam Effects: - Equal opportunity for anyone competent - Floods the market with lawyers → cheaper legal services - Reduces dependency on private gatekeepers How evil is the current status quo? - Artificial scarcity: LSAT + law school + bar = high-cost barrier - Wealth-based access: Only those with money or elite networks can realistically become lawyers - Public harm: Poor people and rural communities get less access to competent lawyers - Symbolic “competence” filter: Doesn’t prevent bad lawyers — incompetent or unethical lawyers exist anyway via public attorneys - Market distortion: Drives up fees, protects law schools and elite firms, concentrates legal power in wealthy hands In short: the current system is expensive, exclusionary, and partially symbolic, while failing to actually guarantee competence. It’s designed to protect privilege over the public, which makes it “evil” from a justice perspective.

This image pretty much covers EVERYTHING about dating dynamics. Look how unbalanced it is... Yet women say "dating is harder for women" 😂 This image was posted and it got almost 5,000 likes. And has over 300 comments. It's not viral enough though, as I'm not seeing it elsewhere. The question is: If this image started going viral and/or a lot of women see it... do you think it would really open up their eyes and understand that we're not 100% equals, men have it way way harder, and maybe start to have empathy and demand less from men overall?

Time to put on those tin foil hats boys but here's a doozy. What if the Vietnam war was nothing but liberals rigging elections. We now know that the 2020 election was verifiably fraudulent which means we have to consider every election being fraudulent. The most liberal changes came in 1968 with the immigration law being changed to allow non Europeans (brown people) to immigrate to the US. Then in the 1970 election women were allowed to enter the corporate workforce and to obtain credit cards. Also in 1971 we took ourselves off the gold standard and moved to fiat currency. Since the 1970 election wages have gone down compared to inflation and we have moved very far left as a society. Now let's look at what was happening at that time, the men who were willing to fight and vote to conserve the values of the country were all fighting and dying in the jungles of Vietnam in the late 60's and let's be honest with ourselves what are the true odds that all of their overseas ballots made it home in those 2 elections? Men on the right were out fighting for the country. What was happening back home? Liberal men were voting and protesting, doing everything in their power to not get sent to fight. Liberal women were being brainwashed by Gloria steinum and the rest of the CIA feminist. The social messages that was being pushed were "free love without social construct," "diversity is strength" "we are a nation of immigrants" "the white patriarchy must be defeated". The powers at be were trying to tear down the values of the country and they were using the woke liberal boomers who refused to go to war as weapons in the voting booths. It's something to think about, that the changes that were made in 1968 and 1970 and that are continued to be made today are being made by people who have such little conviction in what they believe in that they refuse to go and fight for those views, they all just go along with the "social messages" So something that could be a possibility is that we started a war in the 60's to remove the bulk of the conservative voter base from the election process in order to implement the globalist agenda. I'd love to hear your thoughts, if you think I'm crazy feel free to let me know. @Bo Refec If you have a moment I'm interested in what your take is.

Everything I have ever learned leads to one conclusion there will be less than one billion people still alive in 20 years. First of all this will be a tangent but I need to write down everything I’ve been thinking about for my own sanity, if you don’t read all of it please at least read the conclusion because the conclusion is going to be about how to persevere through the next 20 years and not give up. First of all the world population is not 8.2 billion like the UN says, but is around 7 billion. The UN overestimates the birth rate and never accounts for drops like they should. Jesus Fernandez villaverde, who is the best demographer on the subject states we will reach peak population in about 2045 or even 2040. His model is different from the UN ( peak pop. At 2080’s) because he actually accounts for dropping birth rates. One thing he didn’t account for however is countries overstating their population. China claims that their population is 1.4 billion but their one child policy says otherwise, it was around for at least 2 generations meaning over time the population of young people should have quartered but instead it increased. There are Russian and Japanese studies that claim the population was actually anywhere from 800 million to one billion before the pandemic and after it could be half of that because china was hit the hardest by Covid. Look up ( lei’s real talk ) on YouTube she breaks it down properly. And other countries like Nigeria have not taken censuses in decades leading to overestimated population through basically guessing. Nigerian government officials have come out saying that the population of Nigeria is 135 million not 235 million. this means the current population is 7 billion and near the peak. now that we know about the actual population let’s talk about collapsing demographics most countries have a fertility rate below 2 and the ones above that are rapidly falling just look at South America which is now at a similar birth rate to the US, and African countries TFR ( total fertility rate or kids per woman ) decline by 1 point every 15 years, now most are at around 3 leaving 30 years before the population collapses in African countries which are the highest fertility countries in the world.

No matter who is running in any major election (more specifically the presidential ones,) we can all cast our votes but the states seem to cheat the entire system. It’s all up to the higher powers (and even connections) from candidates running. I was only 4-5 when George W. Bush was sworn into office. But from what I heard, the state of Florida purposely took a very long time to “cast their votes” despite Al Gore seemingly winning. Now fast-forward to 2020, Trump literally had that election won, but multiple states paused voting. Out of nowhere, 100,000 ballots were all for Joe Biden from those states. Not to mention I’m sure he ran some secret campaign, making him a cheater during the 2020 election. Did a bunch of votes just disappear under the rug? The crazy thing is, we don’t know how many other elections could’ve been rigged in one’s favor; it seems like these politicians have very dirty play rather than letting the citizens vote for them naturally. Our votes get stolen & those with power and money are the ones who fund and cheat the ballots. And I guarantee this will continue happening; not enough people are challenging or fighting the system to make anyone stop significant difference & the younger politicians like JD Vance is susceptible to corruption, which that transformation is likely complete. This alone should make anyone stop voting indefinitely.