Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

The AI Edge

284 members • Free

The AI Advantage

65k members • Free

Free Skool Course

9k members • Free

Max Business School™

261.5k members • Free

AB
AI Builders

301 members • Free

AI Navigator

566 members • Free

AI Automation (A-Z)

118.5k members • Free

AI Automation Mastery

21.5k members • Free

AI Automation Society

209.4k members • Free

12 contributions to AI Automation Society
Speed Beats Perfection Every Time
Here's a lesson that took me years and multiple failed products to fully internalize: fast shipping beats perfect planning every single time. I've launched 8+ products at this point. Some I obsessed over for 6 months, perfecting every feature, tweaking every pixel, adding "just one more thing" before launch. Others I forced myself to ship in 2 weeks with barely functional MVPs. The results? The products I shipped in 2-4 weeks outperformed the ones I built for 6 months by 5X MRR. Let that sink in. The "ugly" fast launches generated 5X more recurring revenue than my "perfect" slow builds. Why does this happen? A few reasons: 1) Market feedback is everything. When you ship fast, you learn what customers actually want within days. When you build for 6 months, you're guessing for 6 months. Your guesses are usually wrong. 2) Momentum compounds. A live product attracts users, generates word of mouth, ranks in search, builds social proof. A product in development does none of that. Every day you're building instead of shipping is a day your competition is learning from real customers. 3) Motivation dies in long builds. I've watched my own excitement fade on projects that dragged on. By month 4, I was bored. By month 5, I was looking for reasons to pivot. The fast ships kept me energized because I was seeing real results. 4) Features you think matter usually don't. Half the features I spent months building? Users never touched them. The fast launches forced me to ship only the core value prop, and turns out that's all people needed anyway. The hard truth: your product sitting on your computer is worth exactly $0. The same product live, even if broken, is worth infinitely more because it's generating data, users, and revenue. Ship fast. Learn fast. Iterate fast. That's the game. What's something you've been building too long? Maybe it's time to just launch it.
Speed Beats Perfection Every Time
0 likes • 6h
@David Iya
Built Document Review Queue That Catches 100% Of Extraction Errors 🔥
Automated extraction is powerful. But wrong data in QuickBooks or CRM is worse. Needed confidence-based review queue catching low-quality extractions before problems. Built smart review system. Only reviews uncertain extractions. 100% accuracy maintained with minimal human time. THE APPROACH: Not all extracted data has equal certainty. Some 99% confident. Others 60% uncertain. Route based on confidence. High → auto-process. Low → human review. THE QUEUE WORKFLOW: Switch checks confidence per field (not just overall) Critical fields (amount, date, invoice number) need 95%+ Supporting fields (notes, descriptions) need 85%+ ANY critical field below threshold → Review queue Airtable record: document preview + extracted data side-by-side Slack notification when queue has items Reviewer corrects if needed, approves Webhook continues processing THE CRITICAL INSIGHT: Don't review entire documents. Review specific uncertain fields. Invoice with 99% confident amount but 60% confident date? Only review date. Accept amount. REAL EXAMPLE: 500 invoices monthly. 94% overall accuracy. But 30 invoices have errors. Without field-level routing: Review all 500 (forever) or auto-process all (30 errors reach system). With field-level routing: System flags 45 with uncertain fields. Review 45 takes 60 minutes monthly. Zero errors reach destination. THE REVIEW INTERFACE: Document preview embedded Extracted data in clean format Confidence scores highlighted (red <85%, yellow 85-95%, green >95%) Editable fields for corrections One-click approve Mobile friendly. Review from phone. THE METRICS: 500 invoices monthly 45 flagged (9%) 80 seconds average review 60 minutes total monthly Errors caught: 100% TIME COMPARISON: Manual review ALL: 500 × 2 min = 16 hours monthly Smart queue UNCERTAIN: 45 × 1.3 min = 1 hour monthly Saved: 15 hours monthly Template in n8n with review queue here THE LESSON: Automation doesn't mean zero human involvement. Means intelligent involvement only where needed.
3 likes • 6h
@Duy Bui I am amazed
Greetings to you all, I am new here.
i just wanted to introduce myself to you all. I am a poet and an author. My goal is to automate my book contents on multiple platforms, so i can execute the next step.Your input is greatly valued and immensely respected.
Greetings to you all, I am new here.
Please Read | Rules and Guidelines 📜
1) 🚫 No Business Promotions → NO “DM me for…” or "Comment 'Automation'" posts. 2) 🔗 No Linking Your Own Community/YouTube Videos 3) 🏷️ Title Specifically 4) 🔍 Search for Help First (searchbar) 5) 🙌 Stay Respectful 6) ❌ Enforced Clean‑Up Posts that break these rules will be removed without warning. If you ever have questions, feel free to ask. Let’s make this the best AI Automation community out there by sharing, collaborating, and learning together. 🚀
0 likes • 7h
@Nate Herk
🚀New Video: n8n 2.0 is Here (What You Need to Know)
I just walked through everything new in n8n version 2.0. This update brings a refreshed UI, smoother animations, and a few behavior changes that make building automations feel more intuitive. In the video, I highlight the biggest improvements, show how they affect your workflows, and share what you should expect as you transition to the new version. If you want a quick overview of what’s changing and why it matters, this breakdown will get you up to speed.
3 likes • 6d
Very interesting
0 likes • 8h
@Emailfoxi Mailfoxipro
1-10 of 12
@bilguun-gankhuyag-9420
Poet. Author. Founder of Malt Publishing. Let's create together.

Active 6h ago
Joined Nov 26, 2025
Powered by