Literally every trader is using AI wrong.
Its not going to make regular traders, good. Its going to make algotraders, great. Unprofitable traders think they can ChatGPT: "make me a 99% win rate strategy" and create a money printer...they're using it completely wrong. The way that AI works is: Garbage in, garbage out. Think about it if 99% of traders blow up with in 90 days, what are the chances that there are profitable strategies ready to plug and play available publicly on the internet? Jim Simons (the $100B fund manager) died with his secrets. And all quant funds with actual edge are extremely secretive. Which means in an AI future where knowledge, code, and implementation will be democratized and widely available, the competitive edge will come from how quickly a trader can: 1. Observe a new market anomaly (knowing its an anomaly requires years of market exp) 2. Clearly define and communicate it to AI (will require critical thinking which is drying up fast) 3. Backtest and code it into an algorithm 4. Fund it with capital Beginner traders will get left behind due to lack of edge, execution, and capital. Veteran traders who have edge and capital, but lack the execution speed and precision of algorithmic trading. Being slow to adapt, they will also be left behind. The future of trading will be this: 90% of the markets will be lions. Large sophisticated quant funds fighting for position on the nanosecond timeframe. Their battles will be brutal between each other, but they often leave meat on the bone (Big money moves markets, so there will always be inefficiencies). 9% of the markets will be deer. Regular people still trading by hand. Due to their inexperience, they will create massive inefficiencies (like panic selling) that the quant funds prey on. 1% of the markets will be vultures (us!). Algotraders with just enough capital to make fantastic living, yet small enough that the lions can't be bothered to hunt us. (why try to catch a pesky bird when there's newborn fawn to hunt?)