Hi folks, Im live answering folks questions about generative and agentive AI right now for the next hour. IF you have questions about how to improve your profitability of you business with AI feel free to hop into the conversation.

When OpenAI released GPT-5 Pro, the reaction was a mix of awe and frustration. Awe, because the model demonstrates reasoning, precision, and adaptability beyond anything we’ve seen before. Frustration, because its very sophistication makes it paradoxically harder to harness. That’s the paradox behind the video “The $200 AI That’s Too Smart to Use (GPT-5 Pro Paradox Explained)”—GPT-5 Pro is provably smarter, yet often experientially worse if businesses don’t know how to work with it. So, how can leaders cut through the paradox and actually make GPT-5 Pro work for their teams, customers, and bottom line? 🟢Why GPT-5 Pro Feels “Too Smart to Use” The problem isn’t that GPT-5 Pro underdelivers. It’s that it’s so advanced it requires a new playbook. - Complex model orchestration: GPT-5 Pro dynamically routes prompts between reasoning models. That gives you more power, but adds unpredictability. - Longer context, deeper reasoning: With a 256K-token context window, GPT-5 can read books, parse enterprise data, or run simulations—but vague prompts collapse under the weight of its reasoning. - Agentic workflows: It can plan and execute multi-step tasks autonomously, but only if you’re crystal clear on scope and guardrails. - Sophisticated safety and steering: Fewer hallucinations, more reasoning transparency—yet it forces you to think harder about trust, oversight, and integration. Put simply: the smarter the AI, the smarter your approach needs to be. 🟢 Where GPT-5 Pro Delivers Real Business Value Businesses that see real ROI with GPT-5 Pro aren’t just “using” it. They’re partnering with it. - Customer Support & Personalization - Software Development - Knowledge Management - Decision Support 🟢 How to Harness the Paradox Here’s the executive playbook for cutting through the “too smart to use” problem: 1. Start with a narrow, high-impact use case 2. Invest in prompt literacy 3. Integrate, don’t just upgrade 4. Build internal trust with transparency 5. Continuously refine

In today’s AI-powered economy, business leaders are under pressure to deliver more value with fewer resources. AI agents are at the forefront of this transformation, helping companies identify and eliminate waste while enhancing workforce productivity and operational efficiency. Why Cost-Cutting Alone Isn’t Enough In challenging market conditions, executives often default to cutting costs. But cost-cutting is a silo-based strategy—focused on managing resources rather than creating value. The smarter approach? Waste reduction. By removing inefficiencies and redirecting resources to high-value work, companies accelerate growth without sacrificing performance. Gartner highlights the urgency: CEOs must adopt AI agents—or risk falling behind. Yet, hype exists alongside opportunity. Removing silos without a clear strategy can create a “spill” of wasted resources. The most effective organizations are boundless, creating flows of resources where they’re needed most. AI Agents as Strategic Accelerators CFOs and business leaders are increasingly prioritizing AI agents: - 25% of AI budgets are devoted to agentic AI. - 64% of CFOs report AI is influencing business spending. - 74% expect AI agents to drive revenue, not just reduce costs. - 72% believe AI agents will transform their business model. These figures illustrate the dual impact of AI: cost efficiency and strategic value creation. AI agents aren’t just replacing routine work—they’re freeing human talent to focus on high-impact, revenue-generating tasks. Defining Waste in Modern Business Waste occurs when resources are overused, misused, or underutilized: - Overuse: Using human resources for tasks AI could handle more efficiently. - Misuse: Deploying resources in low-value roles or redundant processes. - Underuse: Failing to maximize employees’ unique human skills. From the employee perspective, assigning repetitive work to humans is a lost opportunity for growth. From the customer perspective, misallocated resources reduce satisfaction and impact outcomes.