💰 $1,146.02 in a single day proof that faceless YouTube works. 📈 No filming, no personal brand, just the right systems and consistency. 🚀 I scale channels by picking profitable niches, applying smart automation, and letting the algorithm do the heavy lifting. That’s how this channel hit $1K+ days and the same can happen for your channel if you’re ready to start. 👉 Thinking of starting your own faceless channel? Drop “START” and let’s make it happen.

Thanks for adding me here. Im christian life coach, pastor, husband, and father of 5 soon to be 6 wonderful kids

From team workflows to national strategy, the real challenge with AI is how we structure thinking — not how fast we deploy tools. This morning, I found myself reading about the Asia Undercurrent Series session on Building & Securing Asia’s AI Future, moderated by Gregory C. Allen, with insights from Kay Firth-Butterfield, Dr. Ayesha Khanna, and Kyoko Yoshinaga — and it made me pause. We often look at AI through two very different lenses: At a global level - Nations are figuring out governance, security, and how to keep up with rapid development. At a team level (where I spend most of my time) - People are figuring out how to make Tuesday feel a little less chaotic. What struck me is how similar the underlying challenge is. Whether it’s a government or a 10-person team, the real bottleneck isn’t AI. It’s the system around it. How decisions are made. How workflows are structured. How people think about what “good work” even looks like. And that’s where the gap usually shows up. When I walk into an organisation to build AI systems, I’m not just dropping tools into their workflow. I’m helping them redesign the invisible architecture, the part that actually determines whether AI becomes an advantage or another shiny thing everyone ignores after three weeks. Today’s session reminded me that responsible AI doesn’t start at the policy level. It starts at the team level. With clarity. With structure. With people who know why they’re using AI, not just how. Asia’s AI future will depend on how intelligently we build systems at the macro level. But a company’s AI future? That starts with whether its people have room to think instead of firefight. If that’s the direction your team wants to grow into, I’m always open to a conversation. Sometimes the shift begins smaller than you’d expect. HMU for a coffee chat to discuss more for all the AI enthusiasts in the room!

A few small questions please: 1. How sure are you that Chat GPT and any other such models etc will remain affordable? I feel cautious that we'll be enticed in, made dependent, then costs could rocket . . . 2. Is there a way of easily and quickly organising previous chats, rather than just one long eternal list? 3. Is it right that, within a project, the list of previous chats, only stays within the project, listed in the centre of the screen, under the field we right in? So then we'd have to search more than once, in the different lists/projects (ie, for quick generic questions, I just ask Chat GPT straight, not in a project)?? 4. How will I know or find any responses to this post?? Crazy question in a way, coz if i don't know how to view your answer may never know!! 🤣 5. Can others join this program going forward, how/when? I'm guessing you'll run it again (when you've had a breather!!). And, as things will ever be evolving, will we be able to resit, future versions of this course please? Many thanks Lisa x