🔄 What 70 Million Workers Just Told Us About the Future of Work

New research just dropped that analyzed over 844 different work tasks across 104 occupations. They surveyed 1,500 actual workers doing these jobs and asked them a simple question: "What do you want AI to help with?"

The results were surprising, and they tell us something important about what's really happening with AI in the workplace.

Here's what the data shows:

Workers are willing to let AI handle 46% of their tasks. But not the tasks you'd expect.

They don't want AI to replace them. They want AI to remove the friction that keeps them from doing their actual job well.

What workers want automated most:

Repetitive tasks that follow the same pattern every time (46.6% said this) Stressful tasks that drain their energy (25.5% said this) Tasks that take time away from more valuable work (69.4% said this, the top reason)

Notice what's NOT on that list? The interesting parts of their work. The creative decisions. The human interactions. The strategic thinking.

Here's what's actually happening:

AI isn't eliminating jobs. It's eliminating the parts of jobs that make people say "I didn't go to school for this" or "This isn't what I signed up for."

A perfect example: accountants don't want AI to replace their role. But they absolutely want AI to handle data entry, invoice processing, and repetitive reconciliation tasks. That's not what accounting is supposed to be about. That's just the administrative overhead that prevents them from doing actual financial analysis and strategic planning.

Same with designers. They don't want AI designing for them. But they definitely want AI to handle resizing images for different platforms, formatting presentations, and doing the tedious production work that takes time away from creative conceptualization.

The uncomfortable truth:

The workers most worried about AI aren't worried about losing their jobs. They're worried about losing control and trust.

The research found that 45% of workers are concerned about lack of trust in AI decisions. They want oversight. They want the ability to review and adjust. They want AI to handle tasks, not make final calls on important matters.

This is why the concept of "AI agents" is actually better than full automation. An AI agent can process invoices, flag unusual items, prepare everything for review, and then hand it to a human for final approval. That's useful. That saves time. But it keeps human judgment in the loop where it matters.

What this means for how you approach AI:

Don't ask "What can AI replace?" Ask "What tasks drain my time and energy that AI could handle while I review and approve?"

Most business owners get this backwards. They're trying to find ways for AI to completely take over complex, important functions. That's both risky and unnecessary.

Instead, look for the bottlenecks. The repetitive work. The time-consuming tasks that follow patterns.

Examples of what's working:

A sales team using AI to draft initial outreach emails based on prospect research. The AI handles research and writes the first draft. The human reviews, personalizes, and approves. Time spent per outreach: 2 minutes instead of 15 minutes. Quality: actually better because the human has time to add thoughtful personalization instead of rushing through bulk emails.

A consulting firm using AI to analyze client data and prepare initial findings. The AI processes spreadsheets, identifies patterns, creates visualizations. The consultant reviews the analysis, adds strategic interpretation, and shapes recommendations. Time spent on data prep: hours instead of days. Quality: better recommendations because the consultant has more time for strategic thinking.

A content creator using AI to transcribe videos, generate initial chapter markers, and draft show notes. The AI handles the time-consuming transcription and formatting. The human reviews for accuracy, adds personality, and ensures it matches their voice. Time spent on production: 30 minutes instead of 3 hours. Quality: more consistent because they're not rushing or dreading the task.

The shift that matters:

We're moving from "AI will replace workers" to "AI will work with workers." The question isn't whether you'll have a job. It's whether you'll learn to work effectively with AI tools to become dramatically more productive.

The competitive advantage over the next few years won't go to people who can do everything manually. It'll go to people who can effectively collaborate with AI to accomplish more, faster, at higher quality.

Here's what the research really tells us:

Workers want to spend their time on things that require human judgment, creativity, and interpersonal skills. They want AI to handle the information processing, the repetitive execution, and the time-consuming prep work.

That's not job replacement. That's job enhancement.

Your move: Look at your typical week. What percentage of your time goes to tasks that require your unique human insight versus tasks that are just necessary but repetitive? If it's less than 50/50, there's probably room for AI to help. What would you want to offload? Drop it in the comments.

2 comments