I'm looking for a Founding AI Engineer / Technical Co-founder to start work immediately and profit share from day 1 on current revenue. (not some bs future equity setup) Stage: We operate an AI sales automation agency and are at revenue-generating stage - one 7 figure agency client and one B2B saas so far, and a full pipeline I'm working on closing. Why this role exists: Founder & Commercial operator in place. I run all GTM activity - sales, content, podcast, client relationships, brand. I'm the face of the business. We're building relationships rapidly and getting hundreds of leads from organic posts, as well as launching a sales team to scale further. What is missing is the technical other half. The person who owns delivery, builds the systems, and sets the engineering bar. I cannot ship production-grade agentic systems at the depth our clients need on my own. What you will own: - End-to-end client delivery. New client signs, you architect, build, and ship the system (I can also contribute to product) - Building agentic workflows and AI-native GTM infrastructure (AI SDRs, inbound qualifiers, prospecting engines, intelligence systems) If this is down your lane, send me a note here or on Linkedin with: - Something agentic you've built that you're proud of (link or short writeup) - Hours per week you can commit at the moment (roughly) P.s if you know someone who is a fit, please direct them my way. Happy to send good money for the referral. Best -Abdulla

Not every business is ready for grant funding, and that’s completely okay. A lot of people see grants as “free money,” but in reality, they require a bit more than that. Things like: Clear structure, Strong direction, And the ability to present your idea the right way That’s why I usually see the best results with projects that are already in motion and serious about growth. When those pieces are in place, funding starts to feel a lot more realistic, and less like guesswork. Out of curiosity, do you feel like your project is at that stage yet?

I recently looked over a grant application for a project that had real potential. The idea? Solid. But here’s where it fell short… It wasn’t positioned the right way. The focus was a bit too broad, the impact wasn’t clearly communicated, and it didn’t fully align with what the funder was actually looking for. And the truth is, a few small tweaks could’ve made a big difference in the outcome. It’s a good reminder that sometimes it’s not about changing your idea, it’s about how you present it. Have you ever felt like you had a strong idea, but it just didn’t land the way you expected?

Recently, I reviewed a grant application for a project that had real potential. The idea itself was strong, no question about that. But the challenge? It wasn’t positioned effectively. The focus felt too broad, the impact wasn’t clearly articulated, and there wasn’t a strong alignment with what the funder was actually looking for. With a few strategic adjustments, the chances of approval could have been significantly higher. It’s a good reminder that sometimes, it’s not about changing the idea, it’s about refining how it’s presented. Have you ever felt like your idea was solid, but something just didn’t connect in the application process?

You don’t need more grant opportunities, You need a better strategy. Because applying to multiple grants without proper positioning doesn’t increase your chances, it just increases confusion and burnout. Most founders think funding is a numbers game But it’s not. Serious founders don’t chase every opportunity they see… They position themselves clearly, align with the right funding sources, and approach them with a structured strategy that makes approval easier. That’s the real difference between getting ignored and getting funded. So here’s the real question: Are you currently applying to multiple grants, or would you like help building a more strategic funding approach that aligns your project with the right opportunities?