Tell us three things: 1. What you do (job, industry, student, career-changer, whatever) 2. What brought you to Clief Notes 3. One thing you're trying to figure out right now related to computing or AI I'll respond to every single one. And read each other's intros too because the person who's stuck on the same problem as you might already be in this thread. I'll go first I am Jake, I have been working in tech for 15 Years, building with Generative AI for 3 Years straight now! Excited to teach and learn! That's it. Simple, scannable, gives you data on who's joining and what they need, and keeps the feed clear for content that retains people past week one.

Long prompts decay. You keep stuffing context into one chat window until the model is drowning in your own mess. The fix is not a better prompt. It is a brief written to disk. A brief is a contract. Any worker opens it cold, executes, hands back a result. No shared history. No "as we discussed earlier." The doc is the entire relationship. Here is the template I use. Six sections. Every brief has them. In this order. # <slug> cd <absolute path the worker starts in> ## Task One paragraph. The outcome. What "done" looks like in prose. ## Context Paths to files the worker needs. The spec. The design doc. The prior handoff. Anything not obvious from the codebase. ## Scope - In-scope: what the worker is allowed to touch - Out-of-scope: what the worker must not touch - Kill-switches: time or complexity thresholds that trigger a fallback ## Acceptance - Binary bullets. Either true or false. - Test counts. Commit messages. Evidence file path. - No subjective language. "Looks good" is not acceptance. ## Escalation One file path. If the worker hits ambiguity, it writes a question to this file and exits. Main session reads it on the next turn. ## Returns-with - Commit SHAs - Test pass count before and after - Wall-clock per major task - Final handoff doc path Why each section load-bears Task forces you to state the outcome in prose before a single line of code exists. If you cannot state it, the work is not ready to dispatch. Context is the line between a clean run and a hallucinated one. Never rely on the worker guessing which file you meant. Name the paths. Scope stops the worker sliding into adjacent work. In-scope is the yes list. Out-of-scope is the no list. Both matter. Kill-switches protect you from a worker burning six hours on the wrong branch. Acceptance is the section most people skip. Binary only. If you cannot write acceptance criteria, the work is not shaped yet. You are not ready to brief. Escalation is the pressure release valve. Without it, a stuck worker invents nonsense. With it, the worker writes a question file and exits clean. You read it on your next turn. No wasted tokens.