@Tim Van Thanks for joining the group, Tim, and for your great question — it’s one of the most important questions in human history, because once people understand the eternal nature of angular momentum and see the fact that angular momentum is everywhere in nature, they will understand all physical phenomena in the universe: no more fabricated mysteries. Angular momentum is eternal because angular momentum conserves — energy conserves. There’s no other option because energy is the only entity that exists: wherever it is, it’s there, it can’t disappear into any other “place” because it’s the very definition of “place” itself. An intimately related principle is “there’s no nothingness”. Angular momentum being angular momentum, it just means rotational energy rotates eternally. From the elementary particles of electrons and positrons to the atoms and molecules to the astronomical bodies and to the entire universe itself, everything spins and rotates like a locked gear and all activities are happening according to the law of the conservation of angular momentum. In the Nicene Creed, the theologians talked about god begets god, or from god comes god. If you remove the theological bullshit and only retain the underlying logic, you would get “rotation begets rotation”. Thanks again and look forward to more discussions.

@Aaron Conrad Hi Aaron, thanks for joining the group and for your question. I hope the fact that you are asking such a question indicates you don’t necessarily buy what’s contained in the Wikipedia entry on fermions. The answer is very simple: any and all matter necessarily consists of the two fundamental charges only, namely the electron and the positron. In other words, there’s only one type of “fermion” — electron and positron — the rest are all composite particles, ie no quarks whatsoever. The classification of fermions and bosons is wrong, revealing lack of understanding of the nature of matter. The only valid classification is that of matter and radiation. For matter, only electrons and positrons exist; for radiation, only photons and photinos exist, no gluons whatsoever, and the neutrino is a misnomer — its real identity is photino. The logical explanation can be expressed as the “ontological exclusion principle” — something today’s physicists have never heard of. We can discuss this further in follow up chats. Thanks again!

@Charles Martin Thanks for joining the group, Charles. In the “about” page, a reference is added to indicate the significance of this number. Essentially, when the universe is at its minimum size consisting of a pair of relativistically rotating electron and positron with enormous relativistic mass, it undergoes ten successive divisions to have 1024 pairs of electron and positron before having to inflate exponentially for the first time to accommodate the next ten divisions. Each pair then undergoes further divisions and inflations until the protons are formed at the last stage and the Big Bang takes place. In other words, the 1024 supercomolexes are the largest rotating systems internal to the universe that’s also rotating/precessing as a whole. This structure should be discernible in the CMB with high enough resolution. This community-building process here in Skool from just one member to hopefully millions reminds me of the cosmic process, hence this number. Thanks again and look forward to discussing in more details.

@Govind Naik Welcome, Govind, thanks for joining us, for your question, and for your curiosity. One of the best ways to explain the Big Bang is provided by nature itself through the birth of a baby. What happened before the birth? A lengthy gestational period for the fertilized egg to divide and multiply, developing the entire structure of a human being in embryonic forms and maturing into a fetus. In a physical rather than metaphysical way, the same process took place before the Big Bang: a series of successive divisions marked by stages of exponential inflations, until the protons were formed during a phase transition, heat got accumulated, and the universe exploded with its structure already in place, ejecting seeds of stars and galaxies into great distances. Whether before the Big Bang or after the Big Bang, the universe remains the same universe from the perspective of angular momentum: perfectly and eternally conserved. The mainstream theory of the Big Bang is wrong precisely because it has conceptually excluded rotations from the picture. Instead of seeing the eternal nature of angular momentum, mainstream theories invented their mysterious version of a big bang, fixating on the notion of random quantum fluctuations and using the equally mysterious gravity to explain everything. It’s as absurd as saying that at the birth the baby was just a lump of pink flesh and that it then somehow developed limbs and organs under the influence of gravity. More details of what happened before the Big Bang are contained in Sternglass’ work. Thanks again and look forward to more discussions.

Hi all, please forgive me for using the group email function again to share with you the following press release — the text was largely written by myself, the main objective being to push some substantive statements to a wider audience in case it’s noticed by one or two Einstein-calibre readers who might exist somewhere and could grasp the unique perspectives despite their natural tendency to dismiss such vanity-looking, non-mainstream products. For your information. Thanks. Have a great weekend. https://apnews.com/press-release/ein-presswire-newsmatics/a-groundbreaking-cosmology-treatise-challenges-mainstream-physics-with-a-dynamic-rotating-universe-theory-0c9a24a0e3af9929f70cf69ac469229e?utm_source=copy&utm_medium=share