Well I must say that television programming in Iran is definitely different than here in the United States so I watched 3 hours of it last night just to get a feel of what they presented on main IRIB networks. They mostly had what seemed to be religious programs but also was news and info on this military ceasefire being held so far. Even though the comments were in Persian language I got a sense of what they presented on presenters were saying on certain areas of conversation. One I thought was interesting showed video of protesters outside on streets of Tehran now to me Im not 100% certain but it did not seemed staged in a way that may have been acting just for the television cameras there. I think truthfully all 3 countries news coverage involved since the conflict has begun are biased. Israel’s I24 seems to only present there side of most stories I have seen broadcasted. Iranian news seems to go both way yes believe it or not there is some truth to small percentage of there news items. And here in United States both FOX and CNN have got the events completely incorrect. Hard to believe actually who is telling truth here but in my thinking on this situation I would have to say no side has truly won anything yet lets see how things will play out in days and weeks to come. Thank you.

On April 1st, 2001, the Netherlands became the first nation in human history to legalize same-sex marriage. Years later, in 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court likewise declared marriage a fundamental right protected by the Constitution. President Barack Obama, in a speech at the Rose Garden, declared "love is love" as he celebrated the ruling as "a victory for America." And most Americans seem to agree. A gallop poll suggests that approximately 88% of democrats and nearly 50% of Republicans support gay marriage. So it seems the debate is over. But should it be? In 2007, an Assumptionist priest by the name of Barry Bercier wrote in his book, Skies of Babylon, that if traditional marriage were re-defined to include same sex couples, "the result would be nothing less than the end of the world of man." Sound dramatic? Well -- what is marriage? If marriage were merely a proclamation of love, and if the fundamental purpose of marriage were to reward people who love each other, then gay marriage should be legal. But society does not give certain legal rights, financial benefits and tax breaks to people simply because they fall in love. At least, until two decades ago, that's not how it worked. Barry Bercier defines marriage as "the public and legal recognition of the pre-political duality of the sexes and the significance of the duality for human beings and the social and political order." In other words, marriage -- traditional marriage as it existed across every civilization for nearly all of human history, is the recognition of a unique relationship that pre-exists law and human constructs. That is, the institution of marriage - from Mesopotamia, to Egypt, China, Rome and every Western nation until 2001 -- recognized the duality of the sexes through law because the duality is the nucleus from which life emerges. The relationship between male and female -- man and woman -- whether you are gay, straight, black, white, bisexual, asexual, rich or poor, is our beginning; our source. For every human being, the duality of the sexes is our 'sine qua non' -- without it, life would not exist.

Video one of the series, 5 minutes total length. Important quote from 2015 Denmark PM “many in the US associate the Nordic model with socialism… Denmark is far from a socialist planned economy” https://www.prageru.com/videos/capitalism-vs-socialism Video 2 “A moral case for capitalism” : https://www.prageru.com/videos/a-moral-case-for-capitalism

I'm trying my hand at making cartoons with the help of ai please tell me what you think ,:)