Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More
Liberty Politics Discussion

5k members • Free

247 contributions to Liberty Politics Discussion
Feed Traffic
We have received comments that the feed feels heavily congested, difficult to get through as well as intimidating due to such high volume of posts. We’d ask that individual members limit their daily posts to 2 or 3, so that we don’t monopolize on the space and keep it inviting for new contributors, as well as make it easier to catch up on the feed for those who log in. Thank you for your attention to this matter. -Mods
Feed Traffic
0 likes • 3d
@Timothy Cline 🥹💕🙌🏼
1 like • 2d
@Timothy Cline misty eyes, a heart and wide open hands lol sorry! Love the beastie reference.
51 Years?
In his Recent speech about the mid-terms, Trump claimed U.S should've destroyed Iran 51 years ago. He emphasized that its was supposed to happen 51 years ago and not 47. Now 51 years ago, Iran was ruled by the Shah. The revolution happened 47 years ago. What reason would the U.S have to go agaisnt the shah? I'm starting to feel like this is isn't a war against the regime, but rather Iran as a civilization. Lindsey Graham had even said this should've been done 2,000 years ago.
2 likes • 3d
@Rr Halda, PhD hi! I’ll bring it up to the mods, however I think generally shitty ideas are allowed here and encouraged so that Armins Army can practice it’s warfare 💕 You all seem to be doing great at getting back to the actual quotes, and keeping it centered 💪🏼 if rules are broken then we can act, but I think until then you guys just decide who wants to take on the dissenting opinion and who wants to starve it ✨💕🙌🏼
4d • 
News
Rescued Pilot in Iran
This is the 60 minutes interview of one of the pilots who was shot down and rescued in Iran. Amazing guy, exemplary Airman. Aim high, fly, fight, win. 🇺🇸 https://youtu.be/KNhO1Umj1so?is=e9dmYCdekU8jR3L5
3
0
Interviews With People Born in the 1800s! Filmed in 1929 Restored in Color
The most intriguing impressions of 19th and early 20th century America through the eyes of people born in the 1830, 40s and 50s. So riveting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-5DCZ4uTFY
1 like • 6d
🤯 this is amazing! Also what the heck they’re over 100 and look like our current 80 year olds! 👀 That’s scary
1 like • 6d
@Instant Bbq no kidding! I was nervous hahaha those bones are old 🫠 Also the way they say “1800 and 32” or whatever the year hahaha I’ll start saying “I was born in the year 1900 and 89”
Mike Rogers, has twice voted against healthcare and other benefits for 9/11 first responders and survivors
Rogers was among Republicans who voted against the 2010 James Zadroga Act to fund healthcare for 9/11 first responders and survivors, which was used in part to treat and monitor 40,000 people who worked in toxic conditions in the attack’s aftermath. The bills’ funding also helped treat responders for more than 50 types of cancer linked to exposures at Ground Zero. In committee, Rogers argued it “jeopardizes the financial health of the United States”. Rogers was joined by 156 other Republicans who voted against it, largely over its $5.1bn price tag, but 17 GOP members broke from the party and supported it. The final package passed the House over Rogers’ vote. “Here’s the thing: Republicans like Mike Rogers love cops and firefighters until one gets shot or burned in a fire and can’t do his job,” Feal said. “That’s their playbook. They say: ‘You’re a hero. Oh, wait, you’re sick? You’re a drain on the municipality and the federal government. Get out of here.’” Rogers sent an email to supporters criticizing El-Sayed over his 9/11 comments, and appeared to lie about seeing Osama bin Laden’s body. In a bold-typed section of the email, Rogers wrote: “I saw the dead body of Osama bin Laden with my own eyes, knowing that together, we had delivered justice for America.” But Rogers was not in Pakistan when Bin Laden was killed by US special forces, nor was he in the White House Situation Room, where then president Barack Obama and senior administration officials followed the raid.
0 likes • 7d
@Jewish Samantha Asking “why” is a natural next step that I think is very important. It seems silly that someone would just NOT want to help those in need, right? So that leads the critical thinker to ask a follow up question “why”? If the way this bill was going to be funded, or the methods used to pass it through were improper in a voters eyes, they can vote NO to force a re-write. It happens on both sides of the isle constantly. Another thing I found while researching this is that this NO vote is a major talking point of Abdul El-Sayed. That in itself, I would hope, would automatically lead someone to question it further.
1 like • 7d
@Daniel Bell they voted no, to force a re write we agree there. I didn’t continue researching this to the tip, was there a re-write? Was a bill presented that fixed those issues?
1-10 of 247
B T
6
579 points to level up
@96559339
🔪

Active 12h ago
Joined Dec 6, 2025
Powered by