Pattern Behind Gary 's this LinkedIN post, you never know!

2h (edited) • 💬 Chat

We were analyzing one of Gary’s post as part of our value prep for creators - 'Why my post is not working or why it worked?' we decode it using audience psychology + Data analytics + AI.

Insights:

𝗖𝗼𝗴𝗻𝗶𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗘𝗳𝗳𝗼𝗿𝘁 𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗲 (𝗖𝗘𝗦): ~𝟭,𝟭𝟱𝟬

Meaning :

Attention is finite. The more mental energy someone spends on a post, the stronger the value signal becomes. A like takes less than a second. A thoughtful 50-word comment may take 60+ seconds with reflection (Method and scoring not sharing here)

122 comments on 377 reactions is unusually high - about 1 in 3 people who reacted also wrote something. That means the post hit a nerve. People felt compelled to respond, not just tap.

𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗗𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗱𝗲𝘅: ≈ 𝟬.𝟰𝟱 (𝗺𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗲-𝗹𝗼𝘄)

Meaning :

Reaction type chosen (Like vs. Insightful vs. Celebrate vs. Love vs. Funny vs. Support) - LinkedIn forces a choice, which is itself attention effort.

This post is NOT "emotionally noisy" - they are agree on one feeling as RDI is moderate-low, if it is high, meaning people feel mix of emotion which is not good.

How : compute Shannon entropy on the reaction mix: Proportions: Like 0.769, Love 0.156, Support 0.056, Celebrate 0.016, Insightful 0.003 Shannon entropy H = -Σ(p × log₂ p) ≈ 1.05 bits Max possible with 5 reactions used = log₂(5) ≈ 2.32 bits. Diversity ratio ≈ 0.45 - moderate-low.

-----------------------------------------------------

𝗜𝗻𝗽𝘂𝘁 (𝗮𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝟭𝟭-𝗠𝗮𝘆-𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟲 𝟭𝟲:𝟱𝟴 𝗜𝗦𝗧)

Post type: short reflective/inspirational

No CTA, no specifics, no question

Total reactions: 377

(Like 290, Love 59, Support 21, Celebrate 6, Insightful 1)

Comments: 122

Reposts: 11

Visible comments analyzed: 10

------------------------------------------------------

This kind of psychology + behavioral + data-backed clarity is exactly what we are building for creators.

0 comments