I've been thinking a lot about grant rejections lately. One pattern I've noticed is that organizations often assume a rejection means the proposal wasn't strong enough. Sometimes that's true. But sometimes the proposal is simply revealing a deeper issue around positioning, priorities, or organizational direction. Curious: What's the biggest lesson you've learned from a grant rejection?

A question I’ve been thinking about lately: How many organizations are struggling to secure funding not because the mission is weak, but because the positioning is still too broad or unclear for funders to quickly understand what they’re saying yes to? I’m seeing more and more situations where teams are: - pursuing multiple directions at once - applying before the core ask is fully clarified - trying to explain too many initiatives at the same time - or assuming the funding issue is “we just need more grants” …when the real issue may actually be strategic clarity first. Curious if others working in the nonprofit/funding space are seeing this too.

Let's be honest. A lot of you are stuck right now. Some of you have been applying for grants and… nothing. Radio silence. Or straight-up "no thanks." Others haven't even started because you're thinking, "What am I supposed to write? I have no idea what they want." Either way, you're stuck. And I get it. Here's the thing: It's usually not your fault. Funders look at what you submitted and can't clearly tell what you do or what you're asking for. They move on. So which one are you? 👉 Drop a 1 if you've been applying but not getting anywhere 👉 Drop a 2 if you haven't applied yet I'll tell you exactly what to fix first.

Most nonprofits don’t struggle because funding isn’t available. They struggle because: - their numbers don’t align - their story isn’t clear - or they’re asking without strategy I’ve seen this over and over again writing proposals. Curious, what’s been the hardest part for you so far:Finding grants, writing them, or actually getting approved?