Hello everyone, This is more of a general question from a facilitation standpoint. Conflicts and disagreements among participants are inevitable. How do you handle that as facilitators and help the group to come together and make a decision? A simple example could be that two subgroups have completely contrasting views about a topic. Voting could be an option but I'm not necessarily a fan of forced voting, i 'm looking for something beyond that which is more meanigful and impactful. Any tips or best practices would be helpful!

The answer? Check out the screenshots attached. But here’s how I see it: 1- Certain sprint activities—like ideation, prototyping, or user research—may be fully handled by AI. 2. AI will suggest endless solutions, but the real challenge is for teams to interpret these ideas and decide on the best path forward - so critical thinking and really understanding the root cause of problems will be imperative. 3. Roles such as “AI Sprint Facilitator” could emerge, yes - but I believe a better collaboration between a "people dynamics" facilitator and a specialized AI scientist or coach will be more feasible and effective. 4. The raise of mini-sprints. Yes, but they will be done in silos, by designers collaborating with AI agents. No more sprint teams. What are your thoughts on this? How do you see the future?

If yes, do you have any tips and tricks for AI Prototype Planning session or for guiding the team through the AI solution development? Thanks in advance for your advice.

Hi! Next week I will start working with a company, facilitating OKR. They are a group of 30 people (managers and middle managers) and I would like to do some activity for us to get to know each other. What dou you recommend? Thank you! 💛

Hi Everyone 👋 I'm currently upskilling organisations in innovation. How would you approach making a session on how to gather and synthesize insight engaging and interactive?