I ran the numbers on our top posts. The #1 was 229 characters.

I built a pipeline with Claude Code to look at what's actually driving engagement here. Classified the top 30 posts by how grounded each one is in first-person experience vs. repackaged content.

The top post by raw engagement: 229 characters, no hook, no structure. Someone shared a specific win in two sentences. 581 engagements. We all know that was

@Alexander Paschka

's Good News post.

The AI-polished ones mostly fell flat. You can tell when someone ran it through a structure. Staccato opener, tension-and-release, etc. This community catches on fast.

What kept showing up in the high-engagement posts: specific tools the person actually used, real numbers, at least one honest admission. Nothing fancy. The details were already there because the work was real.

Kind of what you get from actually working inside Jake's ICM. You don't have to construct the specifics, the folder structure already has them.

What's your tell when a post feels real vs. assembled?

16 comments