So, even with a judgement & bailiff, still GDPR ought to be done.
You think the new bank would just drop the case if there's no DoA? Or shall the matter be taken to Land registry first by submitting an application to remove the mortgage charge from the Land & Mortgage Register? 🤔
Or does it have to be taken to court with Land Registry?
Or this should be dealt with the new Bank even thought there's been a judgemement already?
Also there're 2 charges in the Land registry:
- mortgage charge from the Original bank
- debt enforcement proceedings charge from the Bailiff on behalf of the New bank (the Original bank has been forced to restructure after business failure)
Shouldn't the 2 charges be made by the New bank? 🤔
Or at least shouldn't the 1st martgage charge be changed into the New Bank's name, so that it has the New Bank's name?