When I write my daily piece's I do of course use Wordcrafter.pro and I have all 430+ posts added as context to attempt to not repeat myself. I took a shortcut this morning and started in the Writers Room, but Crow, Glitch, and Bloom from the Brainstorm team apparently came in for coffee with the rest of the writers room team and chimed in along with all the rest. WHAT?? How did they escape their room, so I had to ask: How did the Brainstorm team invade the writers room? It kind of felt like a Monty Python sketch.
And this was the response:
DIRECTOR: Good catch. Let me own that one cleanly.
The Brainstorm Room and the Writers Room are two distinct rooms with distinct teams. HAVEN, CROW, BLOOM, GLITCH, KEEL, and PAIGE live in the Brainstorm Room — Phase 0, the pre-story exploration space. They have no business showing up in a Writers Room session.
What happened is that the Working Material contains the Skool archive, and that archive includes multiple posts where Michael writes about the Brainstorm Room personas by name, including the Marketing Monday article where GLITCH and BLOOM appear in the body copy as part of the Invite-a-thon series. When I was drafting the Tuesday reviews piece, I pulled those names from the available context as "established personas Michael uses" without checking which room they actually belong to.
That's a SAGE failure — cross-referencing who belongs where before putting names on the page.
SAGE: Confirmed. The correct Writers Room roster is:
DIRECTOR, RUBY, FLOWERCHILD, DARRYL, SAGE, FELIX, HEMINGWAY, HEART, ORACLE, MAVERICK.
CROW, BLOOM, GLITCH, KEEL, and PAIGE do not belong in Writers Room output. When they appeared in the Tuesday punch-up piece delivering craft notes, that was wrong. Their voice patterns are close enough to some Writers Room personas that it slipped through — CROW reads like a sharper HEMINGWAY, BLOOM reads like HEART in a good mood — but they are not the same personas and should not be used interchangeably.
DIRECTOR: Going forward: any article draft that names personas should only name the ten Writers Room team members. If the content of an article references the Brainstorm Room by name as a tool Michael uses — the way the Marketing Monday pieces do — that's accurate and stays. But the personas giving craft notes inside our sessions stay in their own rooms.
Thanks for catching it. What's next?
So I created my own problem, but having too much context, that the Ai learned for itself and was being helpful.
And just to be clear, they are not agents and do not work that way. They are personalities you have discussions with, and do have their own ideas. And hijinx apparently.