Why the "AI Solopreneur" Movement is Leverage Delusion

Got into a debate after someone posted that the most dangerous person in 2025 is a solopreneur with AI tools and 6 months of obsession.

Wrong. Sorry to immediately call you out on this.

But using AI for immediate leverage isn't actual leverage. It's leverage delusion.

Here's my take: You need humanized processes first, so you can validate them - before you plug-in AI systems.

You need the human playbook first.

Robots don't go through trial and error, humans do.

The reality is, experimentation requires acting quickly on curiosity - and curiosity is perishable.

Curiosity is part of problem solving - it doesn't happen in the experimentation room, it might happen outside while it's out of mind.

This is intuitive intelligence - humans adapt to circumstances they're deeply obsessed with.

Let me be honest: Every great visionary leader hired people initially who were not profit driven - they were focused on their craft and vision.

Sam Altman is a great example. He's not an operational expert.

He visualizes it, tells people about it, makes them believe in it, and persuades them to be part of it.

The framework that actually works: Having AI Tools doesn't give you leverage - it's low barrier to get access to them.

Having the frameworks gives you leverage.

Tools are commoditized. Systems thinking isn't.

Bottom line: The dangerous solopreneur isn't the one with AI tools and obsession.

It's the one who built human processes, validated frameworks, then strategically automated with AI.

Frameworks first, tools second.

Hope you found this valuable! :)

3 comments

skool.com/ai-automation-society

A community for mastering AI-driven automation and AI agents. Learn, collaborate, and optimize your workflows!

Leaderboard (30-day)

🔥

+3125

+873

+748

+524

🔥

+449