European AI Amid the Clash of Titans · AI Automation Society

European AI Amid the Clash of Titans

If you believe the headlines, European AI and Europe are on the brink of an AI breakthrough. Every week, there’s another press release about a “European champion” – Mistral AI in France, Aleph Alpha in Germany, Silo AI in Finland, the latest pan-European initiative. Add in German Telekom partnering with NVIDIA, Norwegian OpenAI infrastructure build, and it all looks like we are catching up with the US giants.

But the European boardroom question looms large: Are we really building independent, sovereign and SECURE European AI, or just rebranding imported technology and feeding our company secrets to intelligence services and calling it progress?

Let’s cut through the marketing, the regulatory fanfare, and the unicorn hype to get to the facts that actually matter for Europe’s future.

𝔼𝕦𝕣𝕠𝕡𝕖'𝕤 "ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕝 ℂ𝕙𝕒𝕞𝕡𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕤" - 𝕆𝕣 ℕ𝕒𝕥𝕚𝕠𝕟𝕒𝕝 ℍ𝕠𝕤𝕥𝕒𝕘𝕖𝕤?

Let’s start with the reality behind the leading names:

Mistral AI (France): The poster child for French AI innovation, with strong government backing and big funding rounds.
Aleph Alpha (Germany): Promoted as the German alternative to OpenAI, focused on explainable, enterprise-ready LLMs.
Silo AI (Finland): Now positioning itself as Europe’s largest private AI lab, recently going all-in with AMD for its compute stack.
German Telekom + NVIDIA: Germany’s “sovereign” AI cloud partnership, meant to offer European businesses an alternative to the US Big Tech clouds.

On the surface, these all sound pretty good, and they sound like real progress. But a closer look exposes a much more complicated, and, for the cautious board member, a worrying landscape.

𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕀𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕝𝕝𝕚𝕘𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕖 𝕃𝕒𝕨 ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕓𝕝𝕖𝕞: 𝕎𝕙𝕠 ℝ𝕖𝕒𝕝𝕝𝕪 𝕆𝕨𝕟𝕤 "𝕊𝕠𝕧𝕖𝕣𝕖𝕚𝕘𝕟𝕥𝕪"?

Few outside the deep compliance and infosec world are talking openly about this: Any European AI company headquartered in France or Germany is directly subject to local intelligence and surveillance laws.

In France, the Intelligence Act (“Loi Renseignement”) gives state agencies sweeping powers to require data access from local tech companies, even in the name of “national security” (see itnews).
In Germany, the new Federal Intelligence Service Act (BND law, as amended in 2022) also mandates cooperation and data sharing with the intelligence agencies when required, allowing state trojans and telephone hacking, among other “perks”, completely without cause (see freiheitsrechte).

This is not a conspiracy theory. These laws are on the books and can override even GDPR and commercial agreements. Most non-European press either ignore this or assume “Europe = safe and private.” But for any business with serious regulatory exposure, this is not a theoretical risk.

If you deploy an LLM from Mistral or Aleph Alpha for your confidential data or mission-critical workflows, ask yourself: Is your data truly private and secure, outside the reach of all state surveillance?

And we didn’t even mention Silo AI yet. The marketing fluff is all nice and dandy, but the reality still remains – Silo AI was acquired by AMD and is a subsidiary of a US corporation, subject to the US Cloud Act and FISA 702. As is any OpenAI-owned data centre in Norway, or anywhere else, for that matter.

No company or platform today offers a genuinely pan-European, intelligence law-neutral, hardware-sovereign AI platform. The result: Every “champion” comes with legal and technical dependencies that few buyers fully understand.

ℂ𝕒𝕡𝕚𝕥𝕒𝕝 𝕊𝕥𝕚𝕝𝕝 𝔽𝕝𝕠𝕨𝕤 𝕥𝕠 ℍ𝕪𝕡𝕖

One reason for this fragmentation is how Europe funds AI. While the US and China put billions into strategic infrastructure and deep tech, Europe still favours small, “unicorn bets” and fast exits.

Even with Mistral’s €600M round (TechCrunch, 2024) and Aleph Alpha’s $500M raise (Sifted, 2023), the total capital is a rounding error next to Anthropic’s latest $170B pre-money valuation (Reuters, 2025).

Europe’s largest state-backed fund (EIC Fund) has a €3.5B portfolio (EIC, 2025), but most investments are under €10M. We are still betting on volume, not scale.

𝕄𝕖𝕕𝕚𝕒 𝕊𝕚𝕝𝕖𝕟𝕔𝕖: 𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝕄𝕚𝕤𝕤𝕚𝕟𝕘 𝔻𝕖𝕓𝕒𝕥𝕖 𝔸𝕓𝕠𝕦𝕥 ℍ𝕚𝕕𝕕𝕖𝕟 𝕃𝕒𝕨𝕤

Perhaps the most damaging issue is the near-complete absence of media coverage about these intelligence law dependencies.

Major European press outlets are quick to celebrate “AI sovereignty” and the next Mistral funding milestone. But they rarely discuss how French, German or other national laws might expose customer data to state agencies, or limit true independence.

If Europe’s C-suites and public sector buyers are not fully aware of these dependencies, we risk sleepwalking into another generation of lock-in and compliance headaches. There is no shame in national security laws; every country has them, but ignoring their impact on data privacy, vendor risk, and business continuity is a board-level failure.

4 comments