I’m building a simple revenue-loss calculator using Tally + Make, but running into a calculation issue. Inputs:• Daily calls (e.g. 10–20)• Missed call % (e.g. 10–30%)• Avg consultation value ($300–$700) Goal:Calculate monthly revenue loss from missed calls. Problem:Instead of a realistic number, I’m getting extremely inflated outputs (like $13B+/month), which means something is off in how values are being passed or multiplied. I suspect:• Tally is sending text ranges instead of numeric values• Or Make is treating inputs incorrectly (arrays/text) Has anyone solved this cleanly without overcomplicating the logic? Would really appreciate a simple, reliable approach!

I have a friend who recently started a web development/digital marketing agency. They help businesses get a website and customers through it. And they have some clients who want AI receptionists, but they're still new to the business world, so they were chatting with me to try to figure out what kind of partnership we should have. Initially, I brought up a referral-type system as being the easiest because I would handle the client relationship, and they wouldn't have to think about it, and I would just pay them for the referral. But they said they want to handle selling the AI receptionist and scoping the project, and they just want me to do the back-end work. What kind of experiences have you guys had with partnerships? And how have you guys figured out the best way to price things so each person gets a fair cut?

COMMUNITY REVIEW REQUEST AI Contractor Agreement — Redacted for Privacy I just landed my biggest client — a 19-location franchise — and they sent me a fully drafted Master Services Agreement tonight with their signature already on it. Before I sign I want experienced eyes on a few clauses that concern me. Here are the specific items I'm pushing back on and why. The full redacted contract follows below. ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ THE THREE ITEMS IN QUESTION ═══════════════════════════════════════════════════ ───────────────────────────────────────────────── ITEM 1 — NON-COMPETE (Section 6.4) STATUS: Pushing back — too broad ───────────────────────────────────────────────── WHAT IT SAYS: For 24 months after the engagement ends, I cannot provide AI consulting, development, or implementation services to any business in the quick lube, oil change, or automotive preventive maintenance industry — in any state where the client currently operates or plans to operate. WHY IT'S A PROBLEM: - 24 months is a long time in a fast-moving industry - The automotive services space is one of my core target verticals - "Any state where they plan to operate" is vague — they're expanding, so this could cover more and more states over time - It's not just their direct competitors — it's the entire industry category MY PROPOSED COUNTER: Reduce to 12 months. Limit to direct quick lube and oil change competitors actively operating in the same specific markets as the client at the time of termination — not the entire industry across all states. QUESTIONS FOR THE COMMUNITY: - Is 12 months reasonable for this type of engagement? - Is market-specific language standard or will they push back hard? - Have any of you successfully negotiated non-competes down in service agreements? ───────────────────────────────────────────────── ITEM 2 — NO-REPLICATION CLAUSE (Section 6.5) STATUS: Pushing back — scope too wide ───────────────────────────────────────────────── WHAT IT SAYS:

Hey everyone, I just released an article comparing Vapi and Retell. Feel free to check it out! https://www.inflate.agency/vapi-vs-retell

I am making an bot for an salon, and it has an get recommendation part, in which user ask question and get answer by AI for the services he shall i get now the client wants me to also showcase the picture of the services with the ai recommendation. I am using Voiceflow and dont know how to show the picture