I have a lot of respect for Alex Hormozi, I've read his books, and he's right about a lot of things. I mean, the guy runs a 100M company, so there's that. But here's the thing—I don't think it's right to use the word "expensive" as the standard. At least, the theory doesn’t tell me the same thing. Mainly because price and value aren't the same thing, and calling something "expensive" implies its value is below the price, which is a personal thing. What I mean is, I like @Mauricio Machado's approach better, which is to anchor a price at 20x and then bring it down to the real cost. If you want, you could even add: "If you're paying 20x, what would you expect from the product?" This way, the prospect tells you what they’re expecting. If you’ve got a good product, it's already included in the price, and then you surprise them with the actual cost. That way, in theory, you'd take away the price objection.