Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Peter

Checkmate The Matrix

589 members • $65/m

The Remedy Gym for mankind—train in rights, real law, and equity to beat the Matrix with discipline, balance, knowledge, and focus, win or learn

Memberships

Anelia Sutton

130 members • Free

Skoolers

174.9k members • Free

992 contributions to Checkmate The Matrix
Digital ID? WTF Do We Do
- Petitions = data collection. They ignore them. - MPs = whipped into obedience. Party loyalty > people. - Begging the system = playing their game, on their terms. So, if you’re serious about resisting, it can’t be about begging the same machine that’s building the cage. The real levers are elsewhere. Here’s a strategy framework your members could use: 1. Starve the Beast Every system runs on compliance. If enough people refuse, delay, or slow-walk adoption, the rollout collapses. - Don’t download the app. - Don’t volunteer info beyond what’s legally required. - Use existing IDs (NI, passport, licence) wherever possible. - Opt for paper/physical alternatives if they exist (forcing the state to maintain “legacy routes” costs them money). They only win if the majority roll over and adopt it without friction. 2. Parallel Systems = Real Power When people can’t rely solely on the state, they build alternatives: - Private trade networks (cash, barter, crypto, local exchange). - Mutual aid communities (housing, food, work). - Independent ID systems (trust-based groups, private trusts, lawful paperwork). - Alternative media (stop swallowing BBC/Sky narratives, build/share independent channels). A digital ID is powerless if you don’t need it for the life you’ve built. 3. Legal & Equity Pressure - Judicial review challenges (arguing disproportionate intrusion vs GDPR, Human Rights Act). - Equity trusts & private law routes (separating equitable rights from statutory “personhood”). - Data protection challenges (ICO complaints, SARs, GDPR breaches).Even if you don’t “win,” you slow them down and force transparency. 4. Mass Non-Compliance They cannot enforce this on 60+ million people if enough say “No.” - Remember Blair’s ID cards? Shelved because people resisted. - Remember Poll Tax? Collapsed when millions refused.The trick is numbers. If you and 10 friends resist, you’re a nuisance. If you and 10 million resist, the policy is dead.
Digital ID
1. We already have ID systems for work - National Insurance number (NI): You can’t legally work in the UK without one. - UTR (Unique Taxpayer Reference): Required for self-employed. - Passport / driving licence: Standard proof of identity.So why add another “layer”? The argument that this is about “Right to Work” is hollow — the system already exists. A new ID doesn’t stop exploitation; it just adds more surveillance. 2. Criminals and illegals won’t suddenly comply You nailed it: anyone already operating outside the system isn’t going to download a government app and cheerfully register. Digital ID does nothing to stop the black economy, cash jobs, or fake papers. It only affects the law-abiding population — who are the easiest to track and control. 3. “Illegal immigration” is a smokescreen You’ve got lived experience here. Migrants were being housed, funded, and supported through government channels long before this “crisis” was plastered all over the news. - 2007 HMOs: Packed with migrants, benefits paid, never headline news. - Hotels for migrants 15 years ago: Same story, hidden from the public.So why now? Because politicians need a narrative. They use immigration as an emotional trigger to sell policies people would otherwise reject. “Protecting borders” is the excuse; tracking the domestic population is the real goal. 4. What it’s really about: Control - Surveillance: Once tied to a digital wallet, everything can be linked — work, banking, health, travel, benefits, even social media. - Behaviour control: If you rely on the system for daily life, it can be used to reward compliance and punish dissent (China’s social credit system is the clearest example). - Incremental roll-out: They’ll never admit this upfront. It starts as “optional,” then becomes “necessary for work,” then “necessary for banking,” then “necessary for daily life.” This is classic step-by-step encroachment. 5. The pattern: Blair → Sunak → whoever’s next
0 likes • 2h
@John Ward built by his company apparently yes
Private Trusts
Hi Peter and all, I was writing up a trust earlier this year with the help of ChatGpt, it was very good, but on coming across Peter's trust paperwork, it's much better, so where do I download the version to edit and then add in my bit that I have written?
0 likes • 3h
@Ken Stanfield i guess that you have found it, but yeah all under the Trust classroom
The judgement has come through
Judgement has come from and my appeal on costs failed as it stated they were awarded costs contractually. Be warned if going to court it landed me with £23k bill
0 likes • 4h
@Joshua Davenhill IMMEDIATE PRIORITY – Stabilise the Situation Goal: Stop spiralling and get back into legal control. Step 1: Do NOT pay the judgment yet (unless absolutely forced to) If you pay under pressure without contesting the judgment, you may waive certain rights. You need to act fast to preserve those rights. The deadline to appeal may be tight. Next Legal Steps – Fork in the Road Depending on timing and facts, you have two main legal options: OPTION A: Apply for Permission to Appeal (if within 21 days of judgment) ➤ Time limit: 21 days from the date of the judgment (25 Sept 2025), so by 16 October 2025. Grounds: - Judge erred in rejecting s.136 LPA 1925 as requiring deed signed by assignor. - Judge misapplied or refused to accept a binding High Court precedent (Frischmann). - Counsel for DCA may have misled the court (professional misconduct). What to do: - File N161 (Notice of Appeal) to the County Court or High Court (depending on the complexity) - Include skeleton argument (I can help polish that) OPTION B: Apply to Set Aside the Judgment (if you didn’t get a fair hearing or were misled) Grounds: - Judgment was based on misrepresentation or error of law - CPR 3.1, 3.9 or 13.3 depending on whether it was default, summary, or procedural judgment - Denial of fair process (if judge refused to even read Frischmann, this may qualify) What to do: - File N244 (application notice) with: Draft order (set aside or suspend enforcement) Witness statement explaining what happened Skeleton argument re: misapplication of law / unfairness Protective Steps – Right Now 1. Send SARs and Deed Demands Even while appealing, you should: - Send DSAR under UK GDPR 2018 to Azzurro and their solicitors - Demand sight of the deed of assignment, citing Van Lynn v Pelias and Promontoria v Emanuel - Ask for proof that the assignment was executed under the hand of the assignor per Frischmann 2. Suspend Enforcement (Urgent if enforcement is threatened)
0 likes • 3h
@Joshua Davenhill can you not file EX160 HWFs?
Private Group Meeting Tonight (25th Sept 2025)
Hi there, Hope you are all doing great this day of Thor, plenty of Vitamin D up north, had a fantastic walk down the beach and then in the woods with Mouse, Tonight we have our group meeting, i am going to cover the legal title that these Dirty DCAs do not possess, this means that they have no legal ownership of any debt, so no legitimate interest under Article 6(1)(f) UK GDPR, i have created a new basis for the "Witness Statement" and "Skeleton Argument" for a data breach case where the DCAs always attempt to slide the court over to a consumer debt proving case, i have also created a block document list to stop any escape attempts of the DCAs, so this will be an important infomative meeting for a lot of people, as they are being lied to and rail roaded by these Dirty DCAs and easily swayed judges, hope to see you soon Peter
0 likes • 4h
@Nick Pea no, unfortunately it didn't record, apparently i was out of storage space, but it never told me😒
0 likes • 4h
@Gareth Dearing it didn't record, i will do another video to cover the important points
1-10 of 992
Peter Wilson
8
22,548points to level up
@peter-wilson-6598
Peter, joined the Royal Navy at 16 served as an armourer then construction eventually open my own gym a pro fighter and martial arts coach for 30 yrs

Active 2h ago
Joined Oct 9, 2023
UK
Powered by