After Each Deal Are You Asking What Went Well And What Didn't?
Navy Seals have a tool they use called an AAR, or After Action Review. Known in civilian circles as a post mortem, unlike a group bitch session, it focuses on what can be learned instead of assigning blame. I find this helpful in reviewing each deal, be they dud or stud. Basically, you ask 3-5 questions: 1. What was supposed to happen? 2. What actually happened? 3. What caused the gap, if any? 4. What have we learned? 5. What will we do next time? For instance, in a deal I recently terminated, it was supposed to provide about $10k in revenues. We ended up investing about 12 hours researching, reaching out to prospective buyers and negotiating with the seller's agent. About $51 was invested in a contracting app we were thinking of investing in anyway. Causing the gap was a willingness to test the market, and further develop the flip process, and therefore not underwriting the ARV or cost of repairs accurately for the market. What we learned, besides a few logistical things, like how to submit an offer with CTM eContracts, favored by quite a few agents in the Denver market, and this particular listing agent, was to think through the time investment required to dispo a property under contract. Also, that we need to have a stronger cash buyer bench hungry and ready for real deals than we currently have. What will we do next time? - Underwrite conservatively, or at least in accord with the current market conditions. - Have a strong buyer's bench ready. - Be mindful that even aside from not losing money, there's a cost in researching and promoting every deal. What experiences have you had where a process like this could be helpful?