I ordered the US 2k ultrasound earlier this week but just got an email that it won't be available until Sept and they asked if I would be open to this LG unit and mentioned it's the same device just a different mfg. Has anyone used this model and if so any feedback? This is what chat gpt said when comparing Here's a side-by-side comparison of the LG Pro Therapeutic Ultrasound vs US-2000 Portable Ultrasound Therapy Device, based on available specs, user experience, and use cases in pain, inflammation, and neurorepair support: βοΈ 1. Basic Comparison Table Feature LG Pro Ultrasound US-2000 Ultrasound Power Output 1 MHz, up to 2.2 W/cmΒ² 1 MHz, up to 3.0 W/cmΒ² Modes Continuous & Pulsed Continuous & Pulsed Timer Settings Up to 30 minutes Up to 30 minutes Head Size Medium (standard) Medium (standard) Waveform Quality Generally smoother Slightly more intense output Build Quality More durable housing, ergonomic Budget-friendly plastic feel User Comfort Softer delivery, good for sensitive nerves Stronger pulses may be irritating for fragile users Price Range $$ β Mid-tier $ β Budget option Known For Reliable for daily therapeutic use, pain relief, tissue healing Good starter unit, suitable for spot therapy or short-term use Noise/Vibration Quieter Can buzz louder and feel more mechanical π¬ 2. Ideal Use Case by Device Condition or Sensitivity Better Option Central sensitization, nerve pain, hyperalgesia β
LG Pro (gentler) Localized muscle injury or tendon pain βοΈ Either, depending on tolerance Cost-sensitive, first-time user β
US-2000 Daily or long-term therapy plan β
LG Pro (more robust and tolerable) π§ 3. For Neuroinflammation or Mitochondrial Dysfunction - LG Pro may be superior due to: Gentler, more consistent waveform Less risk of flaring nerve pain in sensitive areas (temple, vagus region, SFN zones) - US-2000 may overstimulate fragile nerve tissues in people with ME/CFS, CRPS, or severe mitochondrial stress π§ͺ Verdict: If you're sensitive, in 8β10/10 pain, or doing brainstem/neck work, the LG Pro is usually better tolerated. The US-2000 is more aggressive and better suited for muscle, tendon, or localized injury in users without central pain amplification.