Quick note for everyone interested. We’ve had solid "interest" in the idea, but actual submissions are low. For this session to work the way it is meant to, we need enough material to make it valuable for the room. IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN THIS EVENT, please send over your works via EMAIL [email protected] Please send it in by -THE END OF THE DAY. - so we can see if the session moves forward this week or if we should push it to give people more time and prep. AS of now, we are scheduled to go LIVE at 7:00PM THIS Wednesday, December 10th.. Either way is fine. We just want the session to serve you well.

- 📍 1. CONTEXT / INDUSTRY SHIFTMassive Attack has formally requested that their full catalogue be removed from Spotify (globally) in protest of Spotify CEO Daniel Ek’s investment via his VC firm in Helsing, a defense tech company developing AI-powered systems (including drones) and weapons systems. At the same time, Massive Attack joined the “No Music for Genocide” campaign, under which more than 400 artists and labels are asking that their music be geo-restricted in Israel as a protest against military action in Gaza and ongoing human rights concerns. This move escalates a growing trend: artists pushing not just for better royalties or exposure, but for ethical alignment with their platforms. It forces questions about the moral responsibility of streaming services, the separation (or lack thereof) between personal investments by execs and the platforms themselves, and how culture intersects with politics & human rights. - 📂 2. CASE FOCUS / BREAKDOWN • Massive Attack’s action — Formal request to their label (Universal Music Group) to remove music from Spotify globally, and geo-blocking in Israel for all streaming platforms. • No Music for Genocide campaign — Coalition of 400+ artists and labels, raising awareness and taking collective action via streaming restrictions, to protest alleged genocide & human rights violations. • Spotify / Helsing connection — Daniel Ek’s VC investment in Helsing, a defense-AI company. Spotify maintains the two businesses are separate, but artist backlash shows audiences see overlap. - 📈 3. STRATEGY OR BUSINESS PRINCIPLE Ethical alignment is becoming a core litmus test for both artists and consumers. -Platform leaders’ outside investments are under scrutiny, not just platform policies. -Collective action by artists amplifies impact, forcing labels and DSPs to address values, not just royalties. -Geo-blocking is emerging as a new form of protest, expanding how artists weaponize distribution rights.

Theodore Shapiro wins Outstanding Music composition for a series! https://youtu.be/k-_SX5MheDI?si=CP3iSOzZpDFLV_RY Original Dramatic Score went to Mick Giacchino, for The Penguin! https://youtu.be/l4ZbN2zpHQc?si=gIyM1DjYUSU8lC3o Outstanding Original music https://youtu.be/Pb0pLxPPf8E?si=DKhtncdonXUAoRw0

Since I missed Last week's, here is a bit of a fusion of 2 different topics in one.. — 📍 1. CONTEXT / INDUSTRY SHIFT Two signals are colliding this week. On one side, creators are seizing new ground. Reports from Epidemic Sound and Summit Partners (Sept 9–12, 2025) show how creators are demanding direct monetization, smarter AI tools, and ownership of their pipelines. The “middle class” of artists is being rebuilt around subscription models, live commerce, and community-powered economies. On the other side, legacy systems show cracks. In gaming, Nobuo Uematsu (Sept 8, 2025) warns that mainstream soundtracks are becoming “less weird,” more risk-averse, and more formulaic. Creativity narrows while independent spaces still experiment. Why it matters: as creators gain tools to monetize directly, large-scale institutions cling to safer formulas. The battle line is between empowerment and stagnation. - 📂 2. CASE FOCUS / BREAKDOWN • Epidemic Sound “Future of Creator Economy” report (Sept 9, 2025) – creators now want workflow speed, AI integration, and ownership, not dependency on legacy distributors. • Summit Partners trend note (Sept 12, 2025) – brands and creators are collapsing the “discovery to commerce” pipeline into one step. • Nobuo Uematsu (Sept 8, 2025) – mainstream game music has lost experimentation, with risk only showing up in indie titles. - 📈 3. STRATEGY OR BUSINESS PRINCIPLE The principle revealed: platform divergence. Where risk is punished at scale, creators are building their own economies where originality thrives. For music licensing, this means the most valuable placement opportunities will increasingly come from platforms, games, and communities that are structurally aligned with creator-led experimentation. Safe formulas dominate the mainstream, but new monetization models are rewarding uniqueness. - ✅ 4. TAKEAWAYS / ACTION STEPS 1. TRACK CREATOR ECONOMY TOOLS - Monitor how AI and subscription platforms are reshaping creator revenue. These tools will dictate future placement flows.

Ok Guys so I think we all love sounds. Vox chops,weird recordings we pitch into something else. Give me sounds everyday I'd be happy. What are you go drum designers,sound kits,small botique FX creators? Spill the tea 😁