Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Automation First Client

768 members • Free

AI Automation Society

206.4k members • Free

AI + Systems for Coaches 🤖

4.7k members • Free

AI Automation Agency Hub

273.9k members • Free

Communauté IA

40.3k members • Free

Skool Incubator (Gratuit)

23.3k members • Free

NEOS

3k members • Free

Challenge King of Shopify

23.8k members • Free

1 contribution to AI Automation First Client
They Said "Automation Failed Before" - I Closed Them Anyway (My Comeback Script) 🔥
"We tried automation before. It didn't work. Why would yours be different?" Client 3 on discovery call. Perfect fit. Real pain. Budget approved. Then this objection. I almost lost the deal. THE BAD RESPONSE (What I DIDN'T Say): "Well, our automation is better because..." Defensive. Salesy. Makes them dig in. THE GOOD RESPONSE (What I DID Say): "Tell me about that experience. What happened?" Curious. Non-defensive. Gets real info. WHAT THEY SHARED: "Previous vendor built something. Took 6 weeks. Accuracy was 70%. We still had to manually review everything. Eventually just stopped using it." THEIR REAL CONCERNS: Implementation time Accuracy reliability Ongoing maintenance burden Not "automation doesn't work." But "will THIS automation work?" MY RESPONSE: "Makes sense why you're cautious. Here's how we'd do this differently: IMPLEMENTATION: 1 week, not 6. Start with limited scope that definitely works, expand after proven. ACCURACY: Show you test results on YOUR documents before go-live. We aim for 95%+ on core fields. Anything less, we don't deploy. MAINTENANCE: Built-in monitoring alerts me if issues arise. You're not troubleshooting alone. Most important - 30 days in, if you're not seeing clear time savings, I'll refund the setup fee. You only keep paying if it's working." Guarantee removed all risk. CLIENT SIGNED 2 DAYS LATER. COMMON OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES: OBJECTION: "Too expensive." RESPONSE: "Compared to what? You're spending $X monthly on manual work. This pays for itself in Y months." OBJECTION: "We're too unique/complex." RESPONSE: "Let me show you a workflow I built for [similar industry]. Different details, same core process. Your complexity is the reason you need automation." OBJECTION: "We need to think about it." RESPONSE: "Of course. What specifically do you need to think through? Timeline? Investment? How it would integrate with your team?" OBJECTION: "What if it breaks?" RESPONSE: "Good question. I monitor all workflows daily. Average response time when something needs fixing is 2 hours. Plus maintenance includes all updates and fixes."
2 likes • 7d
You have perfectly established the model by which well-handled objections lead to trust and contracts. Applying this self-reflection model to your "Homework": What is the most dreaded objection you encounter that isn't related to price or complexity, but rather to, for example, internal hierarchy or the fear of replacement by automation?
2 likes • 6d
@Duy Bui Well done! This is a truly remarkable response that goes far beyond simple sales techniques. You perfectly identified the fundamental objection: the problem doesn't lie with the software, but with the value of human expertise. Your strategy is extremely astute: transforming fear into autonomy by directly involving teams in defining validation rules and managing exceptions. By valuing their expertise in handling what AI cannot yet do (complex relationships and cases), you transform their apprehension into a sense of control and autonomy. It is precisely this consultative approach that builds trust and leads to long-term contracts. Excellent point! 👏
1-1 of 1
Lorenzo Kh
1
1point to level up
@lorenzo-kharraz-9377
Hello m'y name IS Lorenzo i living in le mans

Active 2d ago
Joined Nov 24, 2025