Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

Daily Email House

480 members • Free

19 contributions to Daily Email House
3-4 person accountability Mini Pods?
In a thread from last week, @Neil Sutton wrote: === I’ve been in some accountability groups that were very successful. It’s not an “all of us” getting together kinda thing, but those created an opportunity to bond with and become friends with people I might never had met otherwise. The best one was when I was in Brian Kurtz’s Titans group. He assigned the groups of 3 or 4 then we went off on our own and met monthly. We came up with 3 questions we took turns answering in each call and the others would offer feedback and support if needed. It was definitely optional. You put your name in to be assigned to a group if interested. Then you'd be grouped with a few others. I had to look back, and there were just four groups of 3 each. (I was teamed up with the amazing Kira Hug & Shannon McCaffrey.) === Are you interested in this? More importantly, will you actually participate? I'm happy to put the pods together. But ultimately, this is about you, and having a regular little mini-mastermind with two or three other folks in this group, and helping each other out, and socializing, and keeping each other on track. It won't work unless you participate, and regularly. So do you want this? Let me know below.
Poll
15 members have voted
3-4 person accountability Mini Pods?
4 likes • 4d
I have a pretty incredibly thick wall of self-deprecatory jokes spackled together with enough support and encouragement for other people that more often than not when I'm around other leaders I serve them, love on them, make them laugh and then walk away thinking, "What the fuck did I just miss out on?" I do that quite a lot actually. I have permanent imposter syndrome. A millionaire acquaintance of mine created an entire training program and I recommended a lady I knew because I didn't feel capable. I connected another friend to the "perfect" job that a guy, who was in love with me and wanted me for, offered. Those are two examples of a repeating theme in my life. The problem with public gatherings is that you can hide behind a facade and never have to answer the really hard questions, the questions like "Why don't you have the balls to charge those people? Why can't you focus on one thing? Why are you dicking around on yet another creative project instead of finishing the one you started?" Meanwhile, in a one-on-one or smaller group you can't hide. You have to commit because that's what the other strangers are doing and if you don't you're even more of a loser than you thought you were. So yeah. I'm in. I don't think I have much to offer but I sure as hell could use the accountability. I know I'm not alone, but people are scared to commit.
Daily Email House live Q&A call
This Thursday at 8pm CET/2pm EST/11am PST, I'll get on Zoom for a bit of Daily Email Open House: To hang out, maybe have a beer, and answer questions about sending daily emails... making a $1k+ offer... and using your list to pay for a house. If you'd like to join me, here's where to sign up: Daily Email Open House
2 likes • 6d
Only made it for a short amount of time but I'm super grateful! It was lovely.
Who do you ☠️LOVE🐀?
UPDATE FOLLOWING VITRIOL WEDNESDAY: Thanks to everyone who participated. For 24 hours, we roasted, very mildly, the winner. As promised, the Vitriol Wednesday post and all the comments have been deleted to protect the vitriolic. Frankly, it's not an experiment I plan to repeat... but it was worth doing one time. ***** In another thread about joint group projects, @Robin Timmers suggests: "Let’s all verbally attack the same guru." Let it never be said I don't take member suggestions seriously or that I don't implement them quickly. So at the risk of completely going against the vibe of this community, and of poisoning the well of promising future relationships forever... I designate next Wednesday "Vitriol Wednesday," where we can all pile on and say nasty things about some guru who really rubs us the wrong way. But who is that? Who should we pick? Who do you ☠️LOVE🐀? Cast your vote below, and as always, it will influence reality
Poll
25 members have voted
Who do you ☠️LOVE🐀?
1 like • 11d
@Rene Kerkdyk same. But for a different reason entirely. Every single time someone genuinely irritates the heck out of me I discover that I have something in common with them! Eeeeek!
Written rules
Yesterday I wrote a post about unwritten rules that strengthen groups. That post got... 10 likes and 5 people to comment, in a group of 483 members. Maybe it was a particularly bad or irrelevant post. In any case it seems like a good time to talk about written rules. I recently joined a Facebook group. The group is about the same size as Daily Email House, but it's much more engaged. People are enthusiastically introducing themselves in the group as soon as they join (as did I)... ... spontaneously writing up new posts and starting new discussions all the time... ... commenting on others' posts all the time. How? Simple. The group has written rules stating that you have to introduce yourself when you join, and participate once you're inside, or you will get kicked out. And the moderators follow through on these rules. What do you think about that? Please comment below. Or don't. But I've decided to start doing the same: Periodically and randomly and brutally removing people who don't participate inside Daily Email House. Your choice.
Written rules
0 likes • 11d
This is exciting. Did you send that one line email to a bunch of people too or a select few or what?
1 like • 11d
@John Bejakovic you have this really effective knack of sending out emails where I legit have no idea if I'm the only one who got them or not. They seem so innocuous and decently kind. I respond to them like I would to a friend and then hit send only to realize, wait a sec, did he send that to 700 people or what? Hahaha
Unwritten rules
This morning I watched a video about unwritten rules in baseball. (Bear with me if you know nothing about baseball or care nothing for baseball.) I had no idea, but baseball has had, for 100+ years, dozens of unwritten rules about player conduct, for example: - You cannot flip your bat after you hit a home run - You cannot have a beard (all teams, once upon a time, New York Yankees still today) - You cannot score from second base on a single if your team if the game is a blowout and your team is winning Now here's what got me: These unwritten rules are enforced BY THE PLAYERS THEMSELVES ON THE PLAYERS THEMSELVES... often by members of your own team! If you break one of these unwritten rules, odds are great that you will be beaten up, ostracized, or sometimes worse (eg. have a 100mph baseball launched at your face on purpose). Here's what else got me: - If you're a big star and you break a rule in a big moment, exceptions are made - If you're young or inexperienced, then you will be consistently and brutally punished by other players for breaking a rule I remember reading in, I believe, Robert Cialdini's Influence about the importance of hazing rituals to form a sense of in-group identity. That's what this reminds me of. Seemingly arbitrary rules, enforced by group members, as a way of reinforcing the importance of the group and of recommitting their loyalty to that group. Now I've really never belonged to any group, unless that group is the group of outsiders who don't really belong to any groups. But without getting too weird about it... I'm curious: What seemingly arbitrary rules have you experienced or seen in real-life groups you've been a part of? And in online groups you've been a part of?
1 like • 11d
The unbroken rule in every group I'm in but this one is "Don't talk about money" Which sort of sucks because earning money is a necessary part of life.
1-10 of 19
Katie James
4
57points to level up
@katie-james-4263
joyful teacher, helping teens understand how Aristotle's rhetoric connects to the real world in business

Active 2h ago
Joined Nov 20, 2025
ENTJ
España
Powered by