Morning Basecampers. I'm hosting a four-part series beginning later this month called "The Art of Becoming." It's an evolution of one of our most popular programs - the Being and Doing Course, which is being sunset. I'm only going to host this live once. We wanted to offer it at a price-point that could make sense for everyone. Recordings will be available if you can't attend live. If you feel the nudge, I hope you'll join me. Everything will take place right here in Basecamp - just sign up in the classroom. You can learn more @ https://monkmanual.com/pages/the-art-of-becoming

Currently going through Aristotle for a research paper, and thought I’d share a fundamental idea of his that seems relevant to the ongoing discussion. This is a piece of quoted commentary on Aristotle’s general view of what nature and/or natural objects are: “Nature is, or natural objects are, that which itself contains the determination of what it is or is to be, while art is, or artificial objects are, that which has this determination elsewhere. In the plant the determination is in the plant; in the house it is in the builder. The plant makes itself under the conditions of its making. This the house does not do.” For Aristotle, the final end of a natural object, its purpose, its destiny, in some sense dwells within it from the moment it comes into being. This end, or telos, guides the growth and development of its matter, and its environment shapes this natural progression. Its path of becoming, then, is already set from its conception, and changes depending on how other natural objects and forces act upon it. While plants and animals certainly have this kind of determination in themselves, they do not have agency or possession over it. But humans do. And this is what it is to be an human being: to have a destiny, a journey of its own becoming, and perhaps more importantly, the capacity to intentionally engage the journey. Artifacts on the other hand, i.e., tools, buildings, machines, receive their end in a preconceived way. A builder has an end in mind, and chooses and shapes matter to bring his idea into existence; and it’s fitting and good for humans to work with the world in this way to bring forth art, expressing ideas by doing so. But something else happens in machine time. In machine time, an externally preconceived end is placed on the human person in way that’s indifferent to the end already existing within them. This industrial framework not only competes against the destiny of the human person, but blinds them to it. It also shapes the environment in which the person lives, making it difficult to even recognize the existence of the frame.

Does anyone have tips or pointers for using Monk Manual well along with a Google or Outlook calendar? One of my goals is to lessen my reliance on (addiction to?) devices but I need the digital calendar to share schedules, book online meetings, manage travel etc for work.

Hello! The recording of the TimeWise Workshop is up in the classroom. Comment here with your insights or clarity from the workshop!

Each month, I answer the prompt "One question I'd like to answer this month" on the monthly page of my Monk Manual. From there, I transfer it over to my weekly dot grid space, and answering the question becomes part of my weekly par practice. This month, my question is... "What's not mine that I've been carrying?" What question are you living through this month? "I want to beg you, as much as I can, dear sir, to be patient toward all that is unsolved in your heart and to try to love the questions themselves like locked rooms and like books that are written in a very foreign tongue. Do not now seek the answers, which cannot be given you because you would not be able to live them. And the point is, to live everything. Live the questions now. Perhaps you will then gradually, without noticing it, live along some distant day into the answer." - Rilke