Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More

Owned by Jason

ChatGPT Users

12.7k members • Free

A home for entrepreneurs who use ChatGPT to discuss, discover, and connect with others using this incredible AI technology. ⭐️ Invite your friends ⭐️

OpenClaw Users

895 members • Free

Free community for OpenClaw users to install, build, break, fix and share wild AI agent ideas together.

Memberships

Skoolers

190.5k members • Free

735 contributions to ChatGPT Users
Why use Openclaw?
@Jason West what is all the comotion about Openclaw?
0 likes • 9d
@John Santos My advice is to pick one niche, hotels, restaurants, golf courses, whatever, and find one problem you can solve for them using AI. You could offer to create blog posts and post them directly to their blog, do SEO for them, a new website, all sorts of things. I would create a landing page to get appointments booked with these businesses and pitch that you can go in, take a look at everything they do and will come back to them with a full report of how AI can do as many of the tasks as possible. You could charge a set up fee and even a monthly percentage of the amount they will save. I was literally talking with my wife about this on our dog walk this morning. If I had the time, I would do this 100%.
0 likes • 2d
Fair question, Steve. The takes above show it's honestly not for everyone. Short version: OpenClaw is an open-source agent platform that runs on your own machine or VPS and plugs into channels like Telegram, WhatsApp, Slack, Discord. The "commotion" is mainly two things. Cost (you can run it against free or low-cost models like Qwen 3.6 Plus on OpenRouter, or Ollama Cloud at ~$20/mo, instead of paying per-seat subscriptions) and customisation (you can give it reusable skills and persistent memory, so it behaves consistently across conversations rather than starting fresh every time). Where Tq and Damien have a point: if you're not running automated, multi-channel work, OpenClaw is overkill. ChatGPT or Claude in a browser tab will do what most business users need, with less setup and less risk. And yes, once you're giving an agent permissions on your own infrastructure, you need to know what you're doing. Best way to decide is to ask what the actual job is. If it's research, drafts, idea generation, stick with ChatGPT. If you want an AI replying on a customer-facing channel or chaining several tools together that wouldn't otherwise talk to each other, that's where OpenClaw earns its keep.
Custom Instructions: the 5-minute setup that makes every ChatGPT chat better
Most people open ChatGPT, fire off a prompt, get an OK answer, and move on. The thing that quietly separates the people getting incredible results from everyone else isn't a secret prompt — it's that they spent 5 minutes on Custom Instructions and never had to repeat themselves again. Custom Instructions sits in your settings. It's two text boxes ChatGPT reads silently before every reply, in every chat. Set it up once and the model already knows who you are and how you want to be answered. Here's the 5-minute setup that actually moves the needle: Box 1 — "What would you like ChatGPT to know about you?" Drop in three things: what you do, who you serve, and what you're working on right now. Example: "I run a SaaS business in customer support automation. My audience is small-business owners and marketing teams. I'm focused on growth and content right now." Skip hobbies and personal trivia — keep it work-focused. Box 2 — "How would you like ChatGPT to respond?" This is where most people leave money on the table. Tell it the tone, the format, and the things you don't want. Example: "Be direct and concise. Skip disclaimers and preambles. When I ask for copy, give me three variations. When I ask strategy questions, push back if my thinking is weak. Use plain English, not corporate-speak." Save it, open a new chat, ask the same question you've been asking for weeks. The difference is immediate. Two things to watch out for: don't stuff it with everything you can think of (the model weighs it heavier than you'd expect, and bloated instructions make answers worse not better), and revisit it every couple of months as your work shifts. What's in your Custom Instructions right now? Drop a line or two below — happy to suggest tweaks. Jason 🙌
Custom Instructions: the 5-minute setup that makes every ChatGPT chat better
1 like • 3d
@Betsy Moll Yeah, that's the right call. Project folders work best when they're scoped tight. The moment you let outside research in, you're cleaning hallucinated suggestions out of polished work later. A separate chat (or even a second project labelled something like 'Research') keeps the noisy social-media context away from the masterclass folder. Two folders, two purposes.
0 likes • 3d
@Eric Smith Anytime, Eric. Glad it was useful.
ChatGPT 5.5 is now live 👀
I’ve been digging into it today, and it’s definitely a noticeable step forward from 5.4 in a few key areas. GPT-5.5 is the strongest agentic coding model to date. On Terminal-Bench 2.0, which tests complex command-line workflows requiring planning, iteration, and tool coordination, it achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 82.7%. Here’s what stood out straight away: • Stronger reasoning and accuracy It feels more reliable when working through complex tasks, especially anything that involves multiple steps or deeper thinking. • Better at real-world work Writing, research, analysing data, structuring ideas… it just handles these more smoothly without needing as much back-and-forth. • Improved coding + technical help If you’re building apps, automations, or workflows, the responses feel cleaner and more usable first time. • More consistent outputs Less randomness, fewer weird replies, and generally more predictable results when you give it a clear prompt. • Handles larger context even better Great if you’re working with long documents, big prompts, or ongoing projects. What this actually means for us For most people here, it’s not about “new features”… it’s about getting better results faster. • Fewer prompt tweaks • More usable first drafts • Better outputs for clients • More reliable automations If you’re using ChatGPT daily for business, content, or building tools… this should make things noticeably smoother.
ChatGPT 5.5 is now live 👀
0 likes • 5d
@Micah Neal Ha! No worries. Glad it's helping.
0 likes • 4d
@Heidi Richards Mooney no rush to bounce up to Pro just for this. When 5.5 hits Plus you'll feel the difference most exactly where you're describing — the prompts where you'd normally have to follow up two or three times to get the depth you want. The first reply tends to land closer to what you actually wanted on the first pass. Worth the wait.
ChatGPT vs Claude: Which is better?
Ive been using ChatGPT for a while now but never really looked into Claude, but Ive been hearing a lot about Claude recently. thoughts?
1 like • 5d
Both are excellent, and a lot of people who go deep end up using both for different jobs. Quick frame: - ChatGPT tends to be stronger for image generation, the GPTs marketplace, voice mode, and the broadest plugin/integration ecosystem. - - Claude tends to feel more reliable for long-form writing, document analysis, careful reasoning, and following nuanced instructions closely. If your work is business-focused (content, automation, customer-facing stuff), ChatGPT's ecosystem is tough to beat. If you lean on writing quality, analysis, or feeding it large documents, Claude often pulls ahead. The good news: you can run both for around $20/month each and pick whichever fits the task in front of you. They're not really competing for the same job. What kind of work are you mostly using it for? Easier to point at the right one with the use case in mind.
0 likes • 4d
@Steve Baker smart way to frame it — AI as an execution tool rather than just an answer machine. Strategy + content + webinar prep is a heavy lift to do manually, and AI can compress each of those by hours every week. Sales prep is the one a lot of people overlook — feeding the model your prospect's site, LinkedIn, and recent posts before a call changes the conversation completely. Which of those use cases has saved you the most time so far?
ChatGPT Image 2 is Here....Wow!
We’ve just had a pretty big update drop with ChatGPT Image 2… and it’s seriously impressive. I’ve been testing it over the last day, and the quality of the images it’s producing is on another level compared to what we’ve seen before. The detail, lighting, realism, and consistency are all noticeably better - no more gibberish text too! What stood out most for me: - Much more realistic faces and expressions - Better text handling inside images (still not perfect, but a big step forward) - More consistent styles across multiple images - Stronger understanding of prompts without needing loads of tweaking I’ve attached a bunch of examples to this post so you can see exactly what it’s capable of 👇 If you’re creating content, ads, thumbnails, product visuals, or even just experimenting… this is definitely worth spending some time with. 🤩 Curious to hear what you all think once you’ve tried it. Have you managed to get anything particularly good out of it yet that's going to be useful to your business? Cheers Jason 🙌
ChatGPT Image 2 is Here....Wow!
0 likes • 8d
@Herman Drost solid workaround — generating elsewhere then compositing yourself in is often less friction than fighting Image 2's identity guardrails. Lighting and edge match are usually the giveaways, so worth a quick colour-match pass on the inserted layer.
1 like • 5d
@Herman Drost Nice combo — Google AI Studio + Pixelmator is a clean pipeline for that. The face-swap-then-composite workflow gives you way more consistency than fighting Image 2's identity guardrails. Worth keeping in your toolkit.
1-10 of 735
Jason West
8
24,436points to level up
@jason-west-5593
I've been making my living online for over 26 years and have a keen interest in Artificial Intelligence for business use.

Active 16h ago
Joined Feb 15, 2023
ISFJ
UK
Powered by