Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
What is this?
Less
More
Memberships
Launch Lab
320 members • Free
🏛️ Coaching Academy
3.5k members • Free
Community Builders - Free
10.9k members • Free
Reality Creatr™
675 members • Free
Automation-Tribe-Free
4.4k members • Free
Fit Biz Launchpad
563 members • Free
Tony Huge Evolution
3.9k members • Free
SA3 Total Angularity Group
17 members • Free
Synthesizer: Free Skool Growth
42.4k members • Free
8 contributions to Tony Huge Evolution
3d •
Stack advise
I'm planning for a new cycle, Cardanine, SLU-PP, Sr9009, Enclo, Mk677,5-Amino-1MQ The goal is to lose fat, keep muscle. ( building muscle at the same time will be huge if possible) What are the dosages suggested, and timings? ( Do you think this is good combo or too much ) @Tony Huge
5 likes • 3d
That’s expensive and aggressive compound stacking, but I like the idea! Those fat loss compounds are more like auxiliaries than mainstays for fat loss. I would honestly consider adding a peptide or appetite suppressant if you want fast and serious results. Tony’s suggested dosages are good for those compounds although you may want to lower the MK especially at first to gauge your hunger response. For some, the hunger from MK at 20 mg would negate the effects of all four of your fat loss compounds! Keep researching and asking questions. Tony knows his stuff and you’ll find what works for you.
1 like • 11h
@Mohamed Abu Elwafa You mentioned retatrutide; a good GLP-1 protocol is going to easily be stronger for fat loss than all the compounds you have in your stack right now put together. If you execute it properly, reta is the absolute staple of a cutting cycle. Like Tony said, spending your money on tesofensine instead of SR9009 is going to be better, although if you go the GLP-1 route you will not particularly need the extra appetite suppression. Enclomiphene is also situational in your stack, and I don't know your entire situation, but it is a minimal factor in fat loss regardless. If you wanna explain your situation in more depth you can DM me. Good luck on your journey!
6d •
Safe weight loss options for sedentary people
Any recommendations for safe weight loss options for a sedentary person? I’m skeptical of the GLP1s due to their side effect profile like reduction of muscle (including heart muscle tissue)
0 likes • 4d
@Colin Winkelman If you play your cards right, you won’t experience significant muscle loss. It’s mostly about how you eat and exercise while you’re on the GLP. Heart muscle reduction is definitely not an issue if you’re bodybuilding or using significant amounts of exogenous androgens, but even if you’re a normal guy, it’s not difficult to avoid the problem.
0 likes • 3d
@Tony Huge Do you notice significant serotonergic effects with tesofensine? I’m typically not a fan of serotoninergic compounds in general (I actually like to antagonize certain serotonin receptors to disinhibit dopamine and acetylcholine), but I’ve put clients on tesofensine with great results.
1 like • 3d
Depends on your goals. Prami is a moderately risky compound to mess with. Are you looking to shrink your refractory period, increase libido, or what?
5d •
The Bridge Between Natural Limits and Chemical Sovereignty
Most guys never break past their natural ceiling because they don’t know the compounds that rewrite the rules. RAD-140 for aggression. Cardarine for endurance that doesn’t quit. SLU-PP-332 for metabolic fire. The best part? These Natty+ compounds deliver without crushing your natural testosterone production. You keep your HPTA intact while pushing past what “hard work alone” could never touch. My new book calls this “the bridge between natural limits and full chemical sovereignty.” Question for the group: What’s the one training wall you’ve hit that pure “hard work” hasn’t smashed yet? Drop which compound you’re running below👇 Are you 100% sure you’re getting legit product? Free ebook – Miracle Molecules Cheat Sheet Over 160 compounds, stacks, and protocols. http://tonyhuge.is/miracle-now #NattyPlus #RAD140 #Cardarine #SLUPP332 #ChemicalSovereignty
2 likes • 5d
@Dean Arcan Sourcing quality ostarine is easy, but why would you want ostarine in particular? It’s not the best option for nearly anybody imo
2 likes • 4d
@Dean Arcan Sourcetalk isn’t allowed per the community rules. Tony has affiliate sources and these are generally good. If you want more specific info, go like some of my messages so I can get to level 2 and DM 😂. As far as better options, that definitely depends on your particular goals and situation. Ostarine’s big advantage is that it has more research behind it (it did fail in trials, though, never getting approved for anything); AC-262, in contrast, is more of a wildcard, but still a more interesting compound than ostarine imo. What are your goals, where are you at in your journey, and what have you tried so far?
7d •
ATX-304/OS-01
Has anyone tried using ATX-304? From The research I’ve done, it seems like it has great potential with AMPK activation.
1 like • 4d
I’ve talked to people that seem to love it, but Tony is right. I’d definitely want more data and s better understanding of the compound before haphazardly adding it in.
1-8 of 8
@jacob-heyboer-3412
Young personal trainer from NC; undergraduate biology student
Active 11h ago
Joined May 5, 2026
Powered by