You’re capped at ~100 connection requests per week. So what do most people do? They try to push harder… Send faster… Stretch the limits… And end up getting restricted or flagged. Here’s the reality: You can’t scale LinkedIn with one account. Try to force it… And LinkedIn shuts you down. So what actually works? You stop thinking single account… and start thinking system. The approach we use 👇 Instead of sending from one profile… We use multiple pre-warmed LinkedIn accounts that look like real team members. • proper profile pictures • work history • existing connections • natural activity Everything LinkedIn expects to see. Now instead of: ➡️ 1 account → ~100 requests/week You get: ➡️ 10 accounts → ~900+ requests/week What this actually does You’re not just increasing volume… You’re: • spreading risk across accounts • protecting your main profile • scaling safely without triggering limits The result? We went from: ~10 meetings/week → to ~90 meetings/week Same offer. Same messaging. Just better infrastructure. This is how agencies actually scale LinkedIn outreach without burning accounts. Not hacks. Not shortcuts. Just the right setup. If you want to see exactly how this works and how to set it up properly… Comment “Aimfox” below 👇

Who does this here?

Drop your reason for choosing it in the comments.

Seriously… you're lighting money on fire. Close to $1,000/month for tools like ActiveCampaign. And for what? Sending + dashboards. Here's what I'm using instead: Listmonk - Free, open-source email tool - No subscriber limits - No sending limits Amazon SES - ~$0.10 per 1,000 emails - Better deliverability than most tools And the best part… I run the entire system through Claude. No dashboards. No clicking around. Just commands. You go from: "managing email campaigns" → "running a system" Most people are stacking tools …and paying hundreds (or thousands) every month. When you can run the same (or better) setup for almost nothing. If you want the full setup guide + Claude skill I use: Comment "Monk" below 👇

Alright, I want to break down a strategy that used to work insanely well, stopped working for most people, and is now quietly working again if you apply it the right way. You’ll probably recognize this. A few years ago, Loom videos crushed. You’d send a cold email like: “Hey, mind if I record you a quick Loom?” They’d say yes. You’d spend 10 minutes recording a custom video. Send it over. Replies would spike. Why did it work? It worked because it felt 1-to-1. The prospect believed you sat down, thought about them, and made something specifically for their business. That’s the psychology. Now here’s the problem: Doing this at scale is brutal. Recording 10 minutes per prospect doesn’t scale past a handful of leads a day. So people abandoned it. Big mistake. The strategy didn’t stop working. The format did. Instead of sending a Loom, you switch the deliverable. Here’s what works now: You ask permission to do research, not a video. Something like: “Would it be useful if I put together a quick breakdown of your company vs competitors? I can send it over in 24 hours.” That’s it. What happens in their head: – “They’re going to spend time on me” And that’s the win. Now the real unlock: You don’t actually need to do this manually. With automation, you can generate: – mini audits – competitor snapshots – opportunity breakdowns – teardown-style reports All personalized, fast and scalable. From the prospect’s perspective, it feels just as personal as the old Loom videos. From your side, you’re not burning 10 minutes per lead. This is what I call a reverse lead magnet. Instead of giving away a generic PDF to everyone, you offer something that appears custom first, then deliver it at scale. If you want to see exactly how I set it up… Comment “Reverse” and I’ll break it down.