Activity
Mon
Wed
Fri
Sun
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
Jul
Aug
Sep
What is this?
Less
More

Memberships

AI Automation (A-Z)

100.6k members โ€ข Free

Faceless Fortune (FREE)

873 members โ€ข Free

Skoolers

175.1k members โ€ข Free

8 contributions to The Game of Skool
๐ŸŽ“ Is AI the missing piece in your course design?
In the latest Professor Game Podcast, I had an energizing conversation with Dr. Matt Metzgar, author of The Overnight AI Educator. He shares how he's helping educators redesign their courses in just 24 hours using AIโ€”no burnout, no tech overwhelm. And the best part? Students are more engaged than ever. Hereโ€™s what we covered: ๐Ÿ”น Why old-school assessments are killing motivation ๐Ÿ”น How to bring AI into your course (without losing your mind) ๐Ÿ”น A simple 5-step framework that works fast ๐Ÿš€ Now Iโ€™d love to hear from YOU: Have you tried using AI in your classroom, course, or program design? โžก๏ธ Drop a comment and let us know whatโ€™s worked (or whatโ€™s still confusing)! Letโ€™s swap ideas and experiences ๐Ÿ‘‡
2 likes โ€ข Jul 22
@Rob Alvarez Like @Blair Stevenson Says you really listen when the other person is speaking. Personally, when I was still in the teaching space, teaching actual students, I used AI a lot. This was when it first came out; it was a bit rough, then, because I would also need to proofread like crazy, but it was still worth it. It helped me create engaging assessments faster. I just needed to have the idea, and then AI does the rest. I give it a skeleton, AI just adds the flesh, and I just proofread to make sure there's no holes in the flesh so to say. I got like almost a year's work done in like two or three months. It was insane. It was a lovely period, though, before I left the teaching profession.
Would you rather: get 100 paying members in 1 year or 50 in 3 months?
I'm curious, what do you think? I'll be reading the comments and answer myself after a while.
Would you rather: get 100 paying members in 1 year or 50 in 3 months?
2 likes โ€ข Jul 22
@Rob Alvarez It's a great question, and I would have to agree with @Mathew Georghiou on this one. I would have enough chance to iterate over the next 9 months and probably still keep a good chunk of the 50, but I'd have learned so much more in a faster time frame and get more frequent feedback loops because more people are in the community than just like 10 every month.
1 like โ€ข Jul 22
@Lisa Ann True, we do have to keep in mind the quality of managing the community, but I think 50members would be okay to manage. Looking at current community trends, like in super active communities, you have maybe like 20% of the total number of people in there that are actually very active. So thats like 10 ish people really.
Quick Check-In: What Are You Building?๐Ÿ—๏ธ๐Ÿ—๏ธ๐Ÿ—๏ธ
Iโ€™ve been in this community for a while now, and one thing Iโ€™ve noticed is weโ€™ve got a really good mix of people in here โ€”Some just starting outโ€ฆ others already seeing solid tractionโ€ฆ and a few quietly building big things. I'm curious what you're all working on. Drop your answers below ๐Ÿ‘‡: 1. What are you working on right now? 2. If this group could help with one thing this month, what would it be? Letโ€™s get a little loud in here again ๐Ÿš€
Poll
5 members have voted
Quick Check-In: What Are You Building?๐Ÿ—๏ธ๐Ÿ—๏ธ๐Ÿ—๏ธ
1 like โ€ข Jul 22
@Lisa Ann It's good you have a couple of contents already. You can start posting them now on the internet and create a new YouTube channel, just put it on as Private videos to get the momentum and get used to it. When you're fully ready in winter, you can either make them private or you can even upload right now, making those videos private. During winter, you can edit them and then re-upload as you did in summer. The best part its completely free.
1 like โ€ข Jul 22
@Mathew Georghiou Oh, that sounds like a lot of work. How you juggling so much activities and so many things?
What are you really good at?
I'd like to get to know more of each of you, and perhaps figure out ways we can help each other, so lets share what we are really good at! Let us know in the comments.
1 like โ€ข Jul 22
@Blair Stevenson That's super cool. Are you planning to build a community around that, or something else?
2 likes โ€ข Jul 22
@Blair Stevenson @Rob Alvarez Good point. Thanks a lot guys. I just have to get started first. Warm introductions seems like a good place to start using my current network.
Coffee chat nostalgia, and another name for the goldilocks experience ๐Ÿค”
Great call with @Rob Alvarez & @Aaron Gold todayโ€ฆ already looking forward to the next oneโ€ฆ which says alot because I need to set an early morning alarm to make it (and I donโ€™t do that easily for just anything! ๐Ÿ˜œ) We learned that the technical name of the goldilocks experience in a game or challenge isโ€ฆ โ€œFlow Theoryโ€ (which is the โ€œjust rightโ€ sweet spot between too hard and too easy) Reminisced about our early game memories to which we all shared some common ones even though the three of us represented three different generations :) ๐Ÿ‘ฆ๐Ÿพ๐Ÿ‘จ๐Ÿป๐Ÿ‘ต๐Ÿป But now Iโ€™m curious about otherโ€™s early game memoriesโ€ฆ And who do you remember playing the most games with?? For me it was lots of puzzles, dice, card games and word games. Mostly with my grandmother and my sister. (I was pretty much โ€œallergicโ€ to anything sports related! ๐Ÿ˜) I also remember really enjoying a game called Payday. (as a kid anywayโ€ฆ then it became all to real and not quite as fun anymore ๐Ÿ˜‚)
2 likes โ€ข Jul 21
Yeah, it was definitely a great call. I was super excited to be on a call with two other generations. Otherwise, it was a very good call. I'd definitely love to hear other people's early game child memories and what exactly made it stick for them. @Lisa Ann
2 likes โ€ข Jul 21
@Rob Alvarez That name sure gave me a hard time. haha
1-8 of 8
Aaron Gold
3
10points to level up
Helping Skool creators 2x engagement + sales (no burnout). I do the work, you get the buzz. Jollof King ๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‘‘. Friendly Neighbourhood Skool Operator

Active 1h ago
Joined Jun 3, 2025
Powered by