@Felix Urbanek : Only when I'm on WC (XD). Joke aside, I'm signed on almost all the dating app, but I do not actively use them. I Just leave a profile in there, and from time to time I get some match to play with.

@Felix Urbanek : No, but I'm thinking about that. In the past I've closed girls thanks to my "icebreaker"... rarely thanks to photo and Bio (From time to time, on app like lovoo where you can write first)

I'd save number 6 (it seems natural) and maybe 1. The others are so-and-so, in my opinion (IMO). The thing is, if I'm not mistaken, you should manifest high social value more through the environment around you than through yourself. So you should choose beautiful places, different places, and, as far as I understand, you shouldn't look at the camera to make everything seem more natural. Regarding the 'fakeness,' they are fake if you and your lifestyle are not congruent with them. Sartain, if I'm not wrong, suggests to 'fake it 'til you make it.' So the objective is to become like one of the successful guys in the testimonials part of the course, so that the fakeness just go away by itself.

@Mark Zammit For sure! Two of the tricks to take good photos, even on a budget, are in the course as well: 1) Find beautiful places in your city. 2) Take pictures when the natural light is at its best (morning usually) Good luck !

@Max Peck : Thank you for the suggestion, I'll give it a look ! I come from the perspective that : (1) We can be together if we are in love without bureaucracy getting in the way. I'm not against couples; I'm against signing a contract where you could eventually lose half (and more) of your assets. (2) I've studied Tantra and some other spiritual perspectives related to sex and couples, but in my opinion people around us are not mature enough for real monogamy. You can achieve a lot in a genuine couple where both people are spiritually and sexually open, but that's super-rare. A lot of girls/women follow this dream of 'marriage' because they saw some movie or read some book—it's just social conditioning, and that’s all. Guys are often tricked or (sexually) blackmailed into that. (3) 'Forever' is a long, unrealistic time. I do not think that human beings are biologically on the monogamy side, just "domesticated" to that. (4) In our Western society, we still give too much importance to sexual exclusivity, securing ourselves in a contract/prison, instead of prioritizing the spiritual, sexual, and intellectual evolution of our partners. Nowadays, I see marriage more as a kidnapping than something evolutionarily relevant. ...As always... ...IMO. (😁)

@Max Peck The book you suggested to me was good ;P

In my opinion, 'toxic masculinity' is just an abstract concept designed to check our natural strive to become independent and action-oriented human beings. It's a way to turn us into passive, domesticated, good dogs. I don't think such a thing as toxic masculinity exists. There are problematic human beings, but those issues are not related to masculinity "per se".

@C J : (1) Personal tastes: I'm not an expert on this, but I like photos 1, 6, 7, 9, and 12. Overall, however, your profile currently gives me a bit of a loneliness vibe (I think Sartain also talks about this kind of risk/vibe in his course, depending on the photos you choose). It's just a sensation; again, I'm not an Instagram expert here. (2) I won't go into specifics because I see a bit of a mindset problem here, but again, maybe it's just my sensation. You come across as 'predatory\mechanical' to me in your way of thinking about those stuffs, by which I mean you seem to be doing this only to reach an objective instead of enjoying people. This reminds me of the beginning of the more traditional 'game' stuff, where people thought that using 'magic phrases' and pirouettes would be enough to 'close' with girls, completely forgetting that we are human and that connecting on a human level is necessary. If I'm somewhat right, I would work on this before focusing on the "steps to take". Owen Cook on his channels talk a lot about abundance\sharing mentality. Again, just a sensation, maybe I'm 100% wrong. (3) I think—but this is just my opinion—that the 'Off-Market System' has some nice suggestions about how to organize your Instagram, but you still need social skills. We are not women, who can take pictures of a nice ass, have zero social skills, and still have people buy us stuff\connect with us; we are men, and we still have to have all-around at least sufficient social skills, if we are not born under the sign of someone else status that promote us. (4) With the '100 steps,' I mean that it's one thing if you are already inserted into a certain environment, already have a reputation, and only lack the "instagram shop front" to leverage your status further (so not starting from zero). It's an entirely different matter (IMO) to start from scratch. In this sense, I believe, as I wrote before, that yes, having a good Instagram can be part of the process towards success, but it's not enough if you don't deliver in person. Again, that's my opionion and experience. We could have the most amazing instagram ever made, but if lack basic social skill, IMO, it wouldn't be enough.

@Giorgio Ferrero : Your instagram seems great to me !